Assessment of Structural and Functional Comparability of Biosimilar Products: Trastuzumab as a Case Study

Biotherapeutics are protein products generated using recombinant DNA technology and manufactured in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. It is often said that “the process is the product” and thereby the effect of the manufacturing process is etched on the final product in the form of its heterogeneity. For any biotherapeutic, the suitable range of the critical quality attributes is defined supported the expected impact of a selected variation on the merchandise stability, safety, and efficacy. For a biosimilar to receive regulatory approval, the manufacturer must demonstrate analytical and clinical comparability with the originator product. As this is mandatory, every biosimilar manufacturer performs this exercise for each biosimilar product under development. However, few reports of thorough evaluation of the quality of biosimilar products are available in the literature. We examined the structural and functional comparability of biosimilars of trastuzumab, a humanized antibody biotherapeutic. The originator product, Herclon (Roche), was compared with four marketed biosimilars: Trasturel from Reliance Life Sciences, Canmab from Biocon, Vivitra from Zydus Ingenia, Hertraz from Mylan. Structural comparability was established using mass spectrometry and spectroscopic techniques like Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential light scattering, circular dichroism, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Stability was compared by performing accelerated thermal stress studies. Functional comparability was established via surface plasmon resonance and biological assays like antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. With respect to comparability, one biosimilar exhibited significant difference in multiple attributes, such as lower percentage of monomer content and main charge variant species, lower percentage of aglycosylated glycoform G0, and lower estimated potency values. Overall, the results indicated general similarity with respect to structure and function, but we found variations with respect to size heterogeneity, charge heterogeneity, and glycosylation pattern in each of the biosimilars.