Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Research Article, Androl Gynecol Curr Res Vol: 1 Issue: 4
Continuous versus Interrupted Techniques for Repair of Mediolateral Episiotomy: A Prospective 6 Months Follow-Up Study
| Kebaili S*, Trigui K, Louati D, Smawi M, Ben Hlima S, Dammak A, Gassara H, Chaabane K and Amouri H |
| Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hédi Chaker Academic Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia |
| Corresponding author : Dr. Kebaili Sahbi Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hédi Chaker University Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia Tel: 0021697556593; Fax: 0021674243227; E-mail: kebaili.sahbi@yahoo.fr |
| Received: June 13, 2013 Accepted: September 03, 2013 Published: September 06, 2013 |
| Citation: Kebaili S, Trigui K, Louati D, Smawi M, Ben Hlima S, et al. (2013) Continuous versus Interrupted Techniques for Repair of Mediolateral Episiotomy: A Prospective 6 Months Follow-Up Study. Androl Gynecol: Curr Res 1:4. doi:10.4172/2327-4360.1000111 |
Abstract
Continuous versus Interrupted Techniques for Repair of Mediolateral Episiotomy: A Prospective 6 Months Follow-Up Study
To compare the continuous suture technique of postpartum perineal repair of mediolateral episiotomies with the interrupted method after spontaneous vaginal birth in nulliparous women.
