Review Article, J Phys Res Appl Vol: 7 Issue: 3

Theory of Erasing (Dropping) the Present

Jalal Al-Khawaldeh^*

¹Department of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

*Corresponding Author: Jalal Al-Khawaldeh,
Department of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
E-mail: jalal.khawaldh@gmail.com

Received date: 18 August, 2023, Manuscript No. JPRA-23-110605;

Editor assigned date: 21 August, 2023, Pre QC No. JPRA-23-110605 (PQ);

Reviewed date: 04 September, 2023, QC No. JPRA-23-110605;

Revised date: 11 September, 2023, Manuscript No. JPRA-23-110605 (R);

Published date: 18 September, 2023, DOI: 10.4172/JPRA.1000038

Citation: Khawaldeh JA (2023) Theory of Erasing (Dropping) the Present. J Phys Res Appl 7:3.

Abstract

Keywords: Philosophy; Time; Past; Present; Future

Introduction

Likewise, existing things are always in one of two states: either at rest or in motion. If they are in motion, they go in every direction: forward or backward, up or down, or in a random, unspecified direction, due to pressure or force. A certain impulse will occur due to its mass and energy. But non-existent things, which we sometimes call “metaphysical,” do not automatically acquire the properties of physically existing things, and everything that is said about them, in the accumulation of human knowledge, is always subject to remaining in the list of unproven assumptions, fantasies, and theories, where they cannot be examined. Laboratory-wise, therefore, the assumption that “metaphysical time” moves forward or backwards, or is in a static state, can be included in the register of assumptions and suggestions, in principle.

If we knew the difference between time, duration, and timing, and we knew the reason why human consciousness turned to looking at time as a basic criterion for calculating the age of the universe, by calculating the speed of light. And the rotation of the planets and stars around each other, and the distance between them and the Earth, and the distance between each of them, in galaxies near and far, so it can be said that time has already become a tool for measuring movement and speed, and has also reserved for itself, the calculation of timing, that is the calculation of the past, present, and future.

Dropping the present, the subject of this research paper, is not a new topic. In 1955, weeks before his death, Einstein wrote: “Those of us who believe in physics know that the distinction between the past, present, and future is nothing but a persistent and stubborn illusion,” and this may be the subject of research into Origin, where Einstein launched the idea of the "block universe", which indicates that the entire history of the universe is one block, which is a real block, and it seems that the past, present, and future are similar and exist at the same time, and that the initial conditions of the universe, according to Einstein, are those It determines what will come later, and that everything is fixed and does not move 1, meaning that the passage from one moment in time to another moment is nothing but a false idea in human consciousness [1].

What raises the subject of this research is what Marina Cortês, a cosmologist at the University of Lisbon said: “The majority of physicists believe in the block-universe view, because it is predicted by general relativity".

Physicists who think carefully about time point to troubles posed by quantum mechanics, the laws describing the probabilistic behavior of particles. At the quantum scale, irreversible changes occur that distinguish the past from the future: A particle maintains simultaneous quantum states until you measure it, at which point the particle adopts one of the states. Mysteriously, individual measurement outcomes are random and unpredictable, even as particle behavior collectively follows statistical patterns.

This research will not answer the question with a question, but rather will attempt to explore the present, as something that lies between the past and the future, whether at the level of human consciousness, or at the scientific physical level, which measures, experiments, and uses time as a main tool in its equations, theories, and applications [2].

Literature Review

Time history

In most of the references that people know, we find one history of time, which talks about the beginnings of human society’s desire to control time and timing, by any means, whether by monitoring the appearance or absence of the sun and moon, or measuring the shadow, monitoring the flooding of rivers, etc., and it seems that this has It actually began to happen during the Agricultural Revolution 10 thousand years BC, and it continued later, through the creation of records documenting the regular repetitions of the seasons and the movements of the sun, moon, and stars and their schedules for many years, and this was all, before any of the laws of physics were formulated, and it is said that the Babylonians They invented the sundial to know the time (which is a circle with marks showing the hours between sunrise and sunset). Some historians also confirm that the first clock in history was made by the Sumerians, approximately six thousand years ago, and it was a primitive clock made of a palm trunk.

When Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) came and explained that the movement of the planets is not only non-circular, but that the speed of the movement of these planets varies based on the distance of their elliptical orbits from the sun. The orbit of a planet around the Sun (or of a satellite around a planet) is not a perfect circle. It is an ellipse—a “flattened” circle. The Sun (or the center of the planet) occupies one focus of the ellipse. Focus is one of the two internal points that help determine the shape of an ellipse. The distance from one focus to any point on the ellipse and then back to the second focus is always the same. Kepler's Second Law describes the way an object's speed varies along its orbit. A planet’s orbital speed changes, depending on how far it is from the Sun. The closer a planet is to the Sun, the stronger the Sun’s gravitational pull on it, and the faster the planet moves. The farther it is from the Sun, the weaker the Sun’s gravitational pull, and the slower it moves in its orbit. Kepler's Third Law compares the motion of objects in orbits of different sizes. A planet farther from the Sun not only has a longer path than a closer planet, but it also travels slower, since the Sun’s gravitational pull on it is weaker [3].

What do we notice from Kepler's laws? It is another historical moment, in which time (past, present, and future) has become a major tool not to calculate not only speed and movement, but also to measure the distances between us and the stars, planets and galaxies, and the door was also opened, for the first time, to talk about the age of the universe and the history of its origin [4].

This research paper noted that the mathematical model developed by Nicolaus Copernicus about the centrality of the sun and the solar system, which was followed by Galileo, Kepler, Newton and others, in developing the physical concepts that led to the gradual acceptance of the Earth’s rotation around the sun, assumed that the planets move according to the same physical laws that operate It has the Earth, and this is not an error, but it is just an assumption, since human consciousness, until now, does not know the reality of (the absolute supreme physical laws) that govern the universe and distant galaxies, and that human knowledge of the concepts of time is knowledge that originated in the mind and human cognitive accumulation only [5].

Whitehead says, “We may resort to absolute time and space with its coincidences of events and the intervals between them, but even here it remains open to debate as to whether this interpretation of transitions from one frame of reference to another is the final interpretation, and whether we have arrived at this interpretation or not?” Therefore, measuring linear motion at a constant speed relative to another inertial frame of reference is an additional innovative idea that introduced the history of time itself, and its definition as a concept and term, into templates for which it was not prepared.

Isaac Newton (1643-1727) says: “Hitherto I have laid down the definitions of such words as are less known, and explained the sense in which I would have them to be understood in the following discourse. I do not define time, space, place, and motion, as being well known to all. Only I must observe that the common people conceive those quantities under no other notions but from the relation they bear to sensible objects.

This research requires a long pause at everything Newton said, where ideas were first launched and spread enormously about the relationship of time to movement, then to the senses, then to gravity [6].

Newton derived the motion of bodies that fall under the influence of gravity, and began the first formulation of mathematical physics in the issues of linear time, and he said that the nature of absolute time, What is correct, and mathematically, is that it flows evenly without regard to anything external, and also there is something else called (duration), which is a relative apparent common time, which includes some rational and external.

Newton's expression of the concept of absolute time, which can be measured, and which is the same for all observers, was the following: “Absolute time, real and mechanical, by its own power and by its own nature, flows steadily without relation to anything external.”

In 1905, Albert Einstein launched the theory of special relativity, which overturned the idea of absolute time and linear time flow and proposed the merging of space and time into space-time, that is, a world line rather than a timeline [1].

The fundamental propositions of special relativity were amazing, regardless of the exact validity of the (then) known laws of either mechanics or electrodynamics. These propositions were the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum and the independence of physical laws (especially the constancy of the speed of light) from the choice of inertial system.

Time is "a ruler" of measurement

The historical transformation moment identified by Copernicus, which is that “the Earth is not the center of the universe" was an unparalleled moment. Let us go back to that time and think: If all the mathematicians, physicists and astronomers had found a way at that time to hold a meeting and sit in a global scientific conference or summit, they would have inevitably decided, to wipe out the Cumulative constructions on the concept of time invented by Babylonians and developed by Claudius Ptolemy (90-168), who was based on the idea of “the sun’s rotation around the Earth,” and they will also decide to develop a single concept of time based on the new concept of data, relying on a simple, easy, and very clear method, and they will re-divide the year, month, day, hour, minute, and second [7].

Where is the present?

According to the total accumulation of human intellectual knowledge, we find that time is two times: the first is linear and flows forward, and the second is complex, and it is includes as a decisive element in the concept of space-time. As for the rest of the people, unlike scientists, time remains the lifespan of things, and it is measured by the year, month, week, day, hour, minute, and second (it begins from the moment of birth and continues until the end). Time passes through three basic stages: the past, the present, and the future, and the sum of the lifespan of all things is the length of time until now (which becomes the past after it occurs). As for the present, it may remain under the influence of what is called the current period, and it can also be a year or a month or a week, or a day...!

The Present, invented by linguists, to differentiate between the past and future, is liked by the people very much, and they began to use it more widely, depending on the circumstances they are experiencing. Linguists also put humanity in another critical position, which is that we basically cannot talk about temporal matters without referring to spatial matters, and vice versa, and all of this is rooted in the human intellectual heritage, and has become an integral part of it, as we find it in poetry, novels, and Literary texts, and even sacred texts. which shaped human consciousness and intellectual heritage, then penetrated the scientific community, and because the researcher wrote novels, but he could not get rid of the strict laws of languages, which imposed an inertial literary frame of reference, making it necessary to think about time in relation to place, and we think about place in relation to time, which makes any novelist or writer think about the present time [8].

Human consciousness, according to this research, can focus and try to understand things, processes and terms that arise in the mind, always better, through the powers of imagination that have been granted to all of humanity. It can also build new consciousness and erase false consciousness. If he does that, and realizes that time is something that humans invented as a concept and term that helps them know time and timing, and measures for them, like a ruler, the speed of movement of things, and their age as well, then this will be easy for them, to use it for the purpose for which it was created, without increase or decrease.

From a physical standpoint, according to Isaac Newton, who did not invent time, but rather described it and put it into a law, “time flows forward in a constant, linear manner.” We notice that the flow of river water, for example, does not stop, but rather begins where it should begin, from the source or spring, and continues to flow until it reaches the mouth, then it becomes part of a lake, sea, or ocean, and that the age (amount) of water is calculated when it begins. Its flow from the source and each stage in it flows forward, and let us assume that it is the stage from 0 to A [9].

In (The Philosophy of the Present), A George H. Mead say: “I have spoken of the present as the seat of reality because its character of a present sheds light upon the nature of reality”. The past and the future that appear in the present may be regarded as merely the thresholds of a minute bit of an unbounded extension whose metaphysical reality reduces the present to a negligible element that approaches the world at an instant.

We will notice that what Mead calls “the present” is a very short time that could not be caught by our short vision. But we also notice that the Present has been mixed with another concept, which is “reality,” so they have become together, according to Mead’s phrase: (an infinite scroll) as a four-dimensional continuum of space-time, of events, and intervals. but this new concept (a four-dimensional scroll) needs to be dismantled again, because Mead, an inimitable philosopher and scientist, had invented at that time (1932), in keeping with the fashion of relativity, from the standard metaphysical framework, a relative world, in which he interpolated the present and reality with space and intervals, and everything now constituted a physical concept, as if it already existed, to the point that it could not No mind can comprehend it, no matter how wonderful the idea, language, and wording may seem, but this research can describe this, as mere science fiction [10].

The so-called present is nothing but an idea and a wrong concept that has developed with the accumulation of human knowledge, to the point that we no longer distinguish between the past and the future! We have come to believe that time is (a real physical thing that exists), but what if the Babylonians did not believe that time flows forward and does not calculate the age of things. Rather, their vision was limited to that there is a time that advances by 8 hours with the appearance and crossing of the sun only, but it retreats 8 hours with its absence.. The development of clocks would have been different, and the scientific community came after that, and they will never have thought that time was linear or relative! But we will also notice that the scientific community, which uses quantum mechanics and conducts experiments to calculate every zeptosecond and attosecond, is more precise in dealing with the concept of time, since for them the experience, if it happened, is the past, and if it did not happen, then it is the future, and they do not tend to calculate a period of rest for the bodies between the past. The future may be called the present!

Space-time is an elastic, flexible, vast, and terrifying concept. It accepts the past, the present, and the future, and comprehends them all as one unit, just as it aptly comprehends the squareness of that unit, and its cube.

Examples: How people see time

This research will present an example of an attempt to eradicate the present from human consciousness, but it is an applied example of the concept of time, which includes the past, present, and future, but it requires the focus of human consciousness. The example is simply that there is a person named (X) who wants to cross from one side to another, we imagined that he is crossing from the past directly to the future, and it is assumed that he does not worry about the space that we call (the present) and does not think about it. Imagine the existence of two rooms (P1) and (P2), which have the same conditions, such as temperature, intensity of lighting, etc., and there is no barrier between them, not even a partition. It is imaginary, it is only imaginary geometry, and only an observer can feel it, but (X) does not know anything about the measurements of the two rooms, and suppose that (X) stands with his eyes closed somewhere in (P1), and let us assume that it is the room of the past, then he begins to move From (P1) to (P2), very slowly, his mind and consciousness will begin to work in a certain way. He will think that he is still in the first room. He may have an intuition, but in reality, he does not know where he is now! He may be occupied with an intuition that he is still in (P1), and he will think of himself in the past. However, if he is occupied with an intuition that he has crossed a certain geometric area-even though he does not actually know how much distance is required geometrically to reach the line dividing (P1) and (P2)-he will feel He is in the second room (P2), and he will think he is in the future [11].

What the observer notices in this example is that (X) did not go through something called the present, and whenever (X) takes a step into the future, that step is in the past, even though most scholars confirm that it is not possible to return to the past! However, the observer will also notice that this may be possible, depending on the example. From a physical standpoint, (X) can still take one small step back, and feel that he is in the first room (P1), the room of the past, without thinking about time.

It is true that the pendulum measures time, but in reality, it dances between the two room, oscillating between the past and the future, just as (X) does in the example above, when he thinks himself in an instant (which is less than one hundredth of a second) between the two room. Completely, and he decides to go back a step, then a step forward, and so on, without thinking that time is passing. The pendulum itself, and all its atoms, when it dances, does not look that it is flowing, and likewise the observer of the pendulum does not feel any progress in time, but (X) oscillates between the past And only the future, and the same is true for (X),

The reason for what we feel about time, that it moves forward and does not go back, and that there is something called the present, between the past and the future, is due, as the research mentioned previously, to the mistake that linguists made, unintentionally, in inventing a non-existent space called The present. and that was not corrected, so philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, and others, as well as scientists such as Copernicus, Galileo, Descartes, Newton, and Einstein, were forced to calculate the present time between the past and the future, while in Impact Labs, such as the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, which... Through more than 1,200 superconducting magnets inside the collider, it accelerates the particles to collide at a speed of 0.99999999 of the speed of light. There is no such thing as the present, while conducting the experiments. Less than an attosecond (one quintillionth (10−18) of a second) before the test is conducted, it is merely the past, and the collision experience takes place in total. At that time, in less than an attosecond, that is, it begins and ends before we notice, and all the events that take place during the experiment, and the data that it issues, such as the (Higgs boson) experiment in 2012 to confirm the Standard Model, or experiments and data studying elementary particles (quarks) and matter [12].

Watch tower of cosmic time

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that there is no “time” at all, as a girl named “Fajer” might feel, who sits in a giant tower in the Andromeda Galaxy, and her mission is to study and observe time on Earth, from an extraterrestrial point of view and without Earthly awareness or human consciousness, and (Fajer) uses a telescope hundreds of times more massive than the Hubble, James Webb, FAST, and Green Canarias telescopes. Let’s imagine: what she can see? According to most scholars-this research may not be consistent with their point of view-“Fajer” will see the past and future as one piece, and it may observe and see a person traveling from the village of “Aima” in southern Jordan, which has not yet developed and is still living in the past, and this person is moving to (Dubai), for example, and enters (Sheikh Zayed Road), then turns towards (Burj Khalifa) and (Downtown), and sees the (Dancing Fountain), he sees hundreds of nationalities moving around him, and also all the technologies of the future flashing around him, so this is could be the difference between the past and the future, for Fajer. and If this person suddenly decides to returns to (Aima) village, he goes back to the past, according to the point of view of the observer “Fajer”, and this is not an accurate representation of course-because it depends on relativitybut it is an image through which we move away from the idea of the existence of the present, which does not exist, except in literature [13].

There is no doubt that physicists can write a physical equation about each of (X), the observer (W), and Fajer (R), and estimate the conditions of the location of each of them, and assume that the past is (P) and the future is (F), and also the speed (S). and the mass (M) and finding a function that calculates the difference between the past and the future, physically and mathematically, and they will notice that this function, according to any collision laboratory, and according to any laws of physics, in the Milky Way galaxy, or in Andromeda and elsewhere, will not find (the present) in any of its data.

The only thing we know about the present, which has evolved in human consciousness, to become something between the past and the future, is that what we do now, or during the day, or during the week, we call it the present, to express our situations, our locations, and our circumstances, even if we are running. Now there are three connections at once, the first with (X), the second with (R), and the third with another person who traveled to London yesterday called (N), and we ask each of them: Are you in the past, in the present, or in the future? (X), immersed in the dance between the past and the future, will say (I don’t know), and (N) will answer that he is in the present, while (R) in Galaxy M31 (Andromeda) will say: I am at the same time, which includes the past and the future, and cannot include anything called present!

(R) may answer that she does not know the meaning of “The Earth Time”, and that they have physical laws that differ radically from the physical laws that developed in human consciousness, and that what we think and call time flows forward, They have something called, for example, “Jerk” that goes backwards, or moves randomly, or dances and swings like a pendulum, so it goes forward, for example, 5 years, and goes back 5 years (according to earthly calculations), which is different there, for a reason we still do not know.

Is the presence of the present comfortable? Philosophically, psychologically, culturally, and socially: Yes, the idea of inventing the present is comfortable for the human mind, a space in which it can do whatever it wants. It is not the past, which it may not like, and does not want to return, and it is not the future, which it is afraid of, and fears it will be painful.

Materials and Methods

This philosophical research relied on the method of analytical description. The researcher used facts or information already available, and analyses these to make a critical evaluation of the material.

This research is mainly concerned with generalizations and formulating the theory of (dropping the present) through collecting sources of knowledge related to the concept of time, as well as research related to some natural phenomena or related to philosophy about time, with the aim of understanding the nature of human consciousness’ vision of the past, future, and present (Figure 1).

Through this research we can analyze the various factors that motivate people to behave when dealing with the “present” as something in between the past and the future and it is generally used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to reinterpret existing ones.

Results and Discussion

The present has generally been dropped from mathematical and physical calculations especially in experiments (Deep Inelastic Scattering), which begins where it should begin, and is in the past after less than a zeptosecond from its beginning, and heads towards the future before reaching the next zeptosecond. If it reaches it, it becomes the past again. As for predicting its future, movement, and directions, and what they will be Therefore, as for what remains of the attosecond, it is still unknown, and it is the same thing that happens in the best accelerator that exists so far, which is the human mind, which should work according to the same principle, without inventing a nonexistent space called the present.

Indeterministic future

In the original identity of time, and during its natural flow, according to human consciousness, the future is completely unknown, mathematically, and physically, that is, it is not inevitable, as most physicists agree that quantum physics is not deterministic, because at the quantum level the particles do not have a specific location or location and specific momentum to be measured. This is known as Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. Additionally, in quantum mechanics, particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously, known as superposition, until they are observed to collapse into a specific state. This concept is known as wave-particle duality.

The Swiss physicist Nicholas Gisin published four research papers that attempt to solve confusion related to time in physics, and as Gisin sees, the problem of time has always been a mathematical problem, and he states that time in general, and especially the "present", can be expressed easily in a century-old mathematical language called intuitionist mathematics that rejects the existence of an infinite number of numbers.

Physicists are still trying to make sense of Gisin's theory. Rarely does someone attempt to rewrite the laws of physics in a new mathematical language, but many who agree with him think they can potentially bridge the conceptual gap between the determinism that general relativity acknowledges and the stochasticity inherent in quantum scales. In response to Gisin's article, Nicole Younger- Halpern, a quantum information scientist at Harvard University, wrote, "I've found it so interesting that I'm giving intuitive math a chance to reflect on it."

Some physicists think carefully about time in terms of problems arising from the laws of quantum mechanics that describe the probabilistic behavior of particles. We find, for example, that in the quantum range there are irreversible changes that distinguish the past from the future.

Gisin also confirms that “the universe is not deterministic, and that the sequence of time in it resembles numbers that are generated after decimal numbers in some cases, and thus the passage of time is a creative phenomenon due to which new numbers are born as time passes [14]."

Cross-time systems

When Eddington asks whether the necessity with which the world deals determine the present from the independent past? Since Whitehead's alternative doctrine is that points of view exist in nature as discrete temporal systems, and thus produce not only a different present but also a different past with it, how can Whitehead's vision, with the fixed space-time geometry that he accepts, escape from a fixed system of events even though the essence of... "These events depend on the entry of eternal beings created through the work of God, causing these events to appear ?"

The answer to Eddington's questions may be related to the fact that there is no present at all, and what necessity has produced is merely a past. It may be different, of course, but it is not present at all. Eddington himself sees the same thing, but in a different way. He says (the present as "the seat of “Reality” strongly imposes our retrospective view of the past insofar as it helps shape the future) that is, in the sense that reality, which occurs now, is nothing but the past only, but it can be said that Whitehead is correct in the existence of points of view that operate as intersecting temporal systems, but they are not a fixed space-time geometry, Rather, it is the geometry of a place, past, and future, in three dimensions only.

There may be a metaphysical relationship between what we are presenting here and the truth about the secrets of the universe and existence. (This part that we are talking about, or trying to describe, is a purely philosophical idea, and not scientific) it is the assumption of the existence of secret back channels for communication between fundamental particles and the forces that govern the universe, but it could be conscious and intelligent channels that use quarks like wireless communication chips, they cause unexpected events, calamities, surprises and miracles. It can also be assumed, from a philosophical perspective, that only believers in that system, can deal with it, while we cannot feel it, as our minds work differently, and we monitor ourselves in a more complex way, but we can imagine, or assume, for example, the existence of secret open backchannels of communication between the force that does not play dice (according to Einstein) and maintains the stability of the solar system (according to Newton), and all the fundamental particles in the universe, electrons, protons, neutrons, and every particle smaller than it, may be connected to a secret backchannel system.

Herbert mead argument

Contrary to what Herbert Mead argued, that the present may be the past and the future, this research cannot imagine that. We originally assume that actual (real) time flows in a linear direction, and it only exists for an observer, in moving matter or a moving environment, or both, which is most likely. Static matter and a static environment do not produce a past, and may not produce a future, if it maintains its stillness. Therefore, the present must be isolated from the past and the future, as the present may only be available to a static substance or atom in a completely static environment, in Its internal components, its surroundings, and its external environment, where time passes without being subject to any of the variables, and it is also required that there is no ability to observe and monitor it, and since until now, there is no static matter or atom, in the visible universe, and there is no static environment, since everything It rotates and moves, quickly or slowly, for an observer, and everything is subject to a changing variable, not a fixed variable, so the flow of time, in everything that can be monitored, seems to exceed the present, and moves in every zeptosecond directly from the past to the future.

If we agree on this, in one way or another, then between each attosecond, not a zeptosecond of course, and the next attosecond, which is the period whose data can be monitored in the deep inelastic collision experiment, is completely identical to what is happening in our awareness, minds, thinking, life, and the environment around us, and its variables. The many, each attosecond of them, is a collision experiment. It began and ended, and its data can be monitored. Then the next experiment began, it was a past heading into the future, and when it arrived, it became the past again and so on.

Conclusion

The present does not exist in Figure 1 (JTG-PPF), which can describe the flow of linear time (mathematical time), and the physical transfer of matter, on that line, from the past to the future. It is an immediate transition from the past to the future. And the present can only be available to a static substance in static conditions, meaning that the substance, with its atomic components, does not show any form of energy or movement. It is also required that the environment in which the substance exists is completely free and 100% pure of any factors. As for the second condition, which is also essential, it is that there is no observer monitoring that matter or its world. Likewise, the third condition may be that, as a result of that, it is dark and only here, when these conditions are met, can the “present” moment occur, which we can place between the past and the future in the graph of time. The static present, which does not exist in terrestrial time, as it does not have the conditions mentioned in this research, such as the absence of energy, internal and external movement, the absence of an observer, and being dark, may be the dark matter in the universe, that is, the dark matter that permeates. It exists in human consciousness only, and its projection and erasure may help, not only from mathematical calculations, but in all forms of human consciousness, in ideas, sciences, projects, theories, tools for crossing time and its problems, or in calculating timing and invisible extension, and it may Linking the past directly to the future becomes one of the solutions to some of the problems facing research (psychological, social, cultural and scientific). Instead of time being three-dimensional (past, present, and future), time becomes only two-dimensional. As for spatiotemporal geometry, it is three-dimensional and includes: place, past, and future only. There is no unpredictable future.

Author contributions

Jalal Y Khawaldeh

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7872-1967

Acknowledgments

This research is part of my book underwriting named “identity of time” as researcher in philosophy. I would like to thank the Journal of Physics Research and Applications Editorial Team for the useful notes to improve the quality manuscript format.

Conflict of interest

Author states no conflict of interest.

References

1. Einstein A (1879-1955) 'Lieber Vero und liebe Frau Bice'. Autograph letter signed ('A. Einstein') to Michele Besso's son, Vero, and sister, Bice Rusconi, Princeton, 21 March 1955.
2. What Einstein May Have Gotten Wrong? (2020) By Natalie Wolchover and Quanta Magazine, Science
3. Dewald J (2004) Europe 1450 to 1789: encyclopedia of the early modern world.

   [GoogleScholar]

4. Bussotti P, Pisano R (2014) Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" Jesuit" Edition: The Tenor of a Huge Work. Rend Lincei 25(4):413-44.

   [Google Scholar]

5. Wikipedia editors (1985) Time in physics.
6. Mann A (2022) Where Does the Concept of Time Travel Come From? Live charges.

   [Google Scholar]

7. Bedini SA (1963) The scent of time. A study of the use of fire and incense for time measurement in oriental countries. Trans Am Philos 53(5):1-51.

   [Google Scholar]

8. Mc Taggart JE (1908) The unreality of time. Mind 1:457-74.

   [Google Scholar]

9. Riebeek H (2009) Planetary motion: The history of an idea that launched the scientific revolution. Earth Observatory 7.

   [Google Scholar]

10. Needham J (1965) Science and Civilisation in China, Part 2, Mechanical Engineering. Cambridge University Press.
11. Mead GH, Murphy AE (1932) The Philosophy of the Present... Edited by Arthur E. Murphy, Etc.[With a Portrait.]. Open Court Publishing Company.

    [Google Scholar]

12. Eddington AS (1921) Space, time and gravitation: An outline of the general relativity theory. The University Press.
13. Whitrow GJ (1973) Einstein, the Man and his Achievement. Courier Corporation.
14. Blitzer L (1971) Satellite orbit paradox: A general view. Am J Phys 39(8):882-6.

    [Crossref][Google Scholar]