GET THE APP

Laser drilling of metals in water: A model

Journal of Electrical Engineering and Electronic TechnologyISSN: 2325-9833

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Laser drilling of metals in water: A model

Laser drilling of metals in water is essential method for synthesis of nanoparticles with adjustble size distribution and morphology given that there are many experimental parameters (energy, frequency, wavelength, pulse duration, number of pulses, width of the pulse...) which determine characteristics of obtained nanoparticles. One of the most important quantites dependent on these parameters are volumes of craters from which concentration and diameter of produced nanoparticles may be determined. This work shows that Gaussian profile of laser pulses used for drilling of craters projects itself into the Gaussian profile of obtained crater depth vs. radius dependence. Basis of the model is assumption that fluence dependence on width of the laser pulse has the same mathematical form as depth of the crater dependence on the radius of the crater. Corresponding equations for those dependencies were derived which allowed derivation of formula for volume of Gaussian crater. In this work two methods of determining volume of craters will be presented and compared for verification of obtained results. First method is based on observing of crater as piecewise truncated cones and summing of their volumes in order to get full crater volume while the second considers the physics of Gaussian laser pulse projection on Gaussian shape of crater profile where parameters are determined by fitting of modified Gaussian profile on crater profile. By measuring energy of laser pulses using iris, laser pulse waist ω0 was found which isn't the same as waist radius ω of the crater neither before nor after lens focusing. Comparison of volumes of craters measured by optical microscopy and modeled ones with modified gaussian fit show discrepancy in range ±10 % for Ag , ±5 % for ZnO and ±15 % for Au. Developed model states that there are 3 relevant points for full crater description given it has Gaussian profile: surface radius R0, depth D and Gaussian waist ω which equals to the radius at 1e2 depth. Comparison of volumes of craters measured by optical microscopy and modeled ones with 3 points gaussian fit show discrepancy in range ±10 % for Ag, ±15 % for ZnO and ±20 % for Au. Fluence profile of Gaussian laser pulses and areas of successive crater holes drilled with each pulse enables calculation of deposited energy in the crater where crucial parameters are ablation threshold of given metal for given wavelength and pulse duration and incident energy upon metal target. Obtained energies are bounded with lower limit which corresponds to minimal energy needed for heating, melting and evaporation of given mass of metal target and upper limit given as a maximal energy incident upon metal target for given number of laser pulses. Difference in upper limit energy and deposited energy equals to heat diffusion to the crater surroundings and radiation of ignited plasma during laser ablation.

Special Features

Full Text

View

Track Your Manuscript

Media Partners

Associations