Short Communication, J Liver Disease Transplant Vol: 6 Issue: 1
Donor specific HLA Antibodies as a Trigger for Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions (ITBL) after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation-A Case Controlled Study
*Corresponding Author : Gero Puhl
Asklepios Hospital Hamburg-Altona Paul- Ehrlich-Straße 1, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
Tel: (040) 18 18 81 1600
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: February 28, 2017 Accepted: March 16, 2017 Published: March 23, 2017
Citation: Puhl G, Schulte K, Gül S, Schönemann C, Lachmann N, et al. (2017) Donor specific HLA-Antibodies as a Trigger for Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions (ITBL) after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation-A Case Controlled Study. J Liver Disease Transplant 6:1. doi: 10.4172/2325-9612.1000147
Despite recent surgical developments, biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions (ITBL) is particularly challenging accounting for a high proportion of bile-duct associated complications following OLT. We aimed to better predict and reduce the incidence of ITBL through detection of donor specific human leucocyte antibodies (DSA). These could be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease. This approach allows to standardized perioperative DSA-screening in OLT-patients.Prospective database of ITBL-patients (n=15) that had undergone OLT from February 2008 to October 2011 was analysed. Clinical parameters, biochemical data including preoperative HLA-status and postoperative DSA-status, complications, morbidity and mortality were studied. The ITBL-patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio accounting for demographic and clinical variables to a control cohort of OLT-patients. Propensity modelling with matched cohort analysis was employed. There was a significance between the detection of de novo DSA and the development of an ITBL (p=0,003) and an asymptomatic elevation of alkaline phosphatase (AP). This suggested a strong relationship between de novo DSA and future development of ITBL. This implies a need for a protocolisation of care with standardized postoperative DSA-status allowing earlier diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
Keywords: ITBL; Orthotopic liver transplantation; DSA; Donor specific HLA-Antibodies; Complications; Outcomes
Liver transplantations are the only curable treatment for a wide spectrum of liver diseases when other therapeutic options have failed. Despite recent surgical developments biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality.
Ischemic Type Biliary Lesion (ITBL) is particularly challenging and responsible for a high proportion of mortality and morbidity of bile-duct associated complications following OLT.
Donor specific human leucocyte antibodies (DSA) and recipient specific chemokine receptor polymorphisms have been associated with the development of biliary strictures and may contribute to enhanced fibrotic tissue remodelling and biliary stricture formation. In pediatric patients a higher incidence of fibrosis  and unexplained biliary complications were associated with DSA . DSA were not linked to a reduced survival rate after OLT or an increased rate of retransplantation [3,4].
We aimed to better predict and reduce the incidence of ITBL through detection DSA that could be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease.
Finding a link between the development of ITBL and the presence of DSA would allow the implementation of standardized pre- and post-operative DSA-screenings. This already plays an important role in kidney [5,6] heart  and lung  transplantations.
Screening of DSA antibodies might be useful for early identification of patients at risk who could benefit from closer surveillance and tailored immunosuppressive regimen . Our findings have relevance for prediction and management of post-OLT biliary complications such as ITBL.
Data regarding the prevalence, incidence and impact of DSA after OLT are still controversial. To stimulate future work, we summarize the considerable advances of perioperative DSA-testing in order to highlight the open and controversial issues remaining. We add our data to a growing body of evidence advocating DSA testing to predict outcomes in transplantation.
Patients and Methods
Primary liver allograft recipients (n=394) at the Charité University of Berlin, between February 1, 2008 and October 30, 2011 (Table 1), were reviewed. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative DSA testing. 15 patients of the total cohort developed postoperatively ITBL. The ITBL-patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio accounting for demographic and clinical variables to a control cohort of OLT patients (Table 2). Clinical parameters, biochemical data including pre-operative HLA-status and their postoperative DSA-status, complications, morbidity and mortality were analysed. Propensity modelling with matched cohort analysis was employed. Clinical, histopathological and laboratory data were obtained from the Electronic Data Base.
|Age of the donor (+/- 6 years)|
|Same donor gender|
|Recipients age (+/- 7 years)|
|Same recipient gender|
Table 1: Propensity matching criteria for the control group.
|ITBL-Group (n=15)||Control group (n=15)||p-value|
|Age recipient M (SD)||58,8 (± 10,92)||57,1 (± 10,43)||ns|
|Gender recipient: male/female||11/4||11/4||ns|
|Age donor M (SD)||57,8 (± 11,01)||56,07 (± 10,93)||ns|
|Gender donor: male/female||8/7||8/7||ns|
|Preoperative MELD-Score||23,46 (± 12,37)||20,5 (± 10,11)||ns|
|Perfusion solution (HTK/UW)||15/0||13/2||ns|
|Cold ischemia time (min)||635,2 (± 225,05)||506,36 (± 128,87)||ns|
|Warm ischemia time (min)||40,8 (± 14,07)||41,27 (± 10,13)||ns|
|Operative time (min)||298,73 (± 57,09)||320,27 (± 117,78)||ns|
|ITBL diagnosis postoperatively (days)||235,5 (± 103,4)|
Table 2: Biographical-sociological factors between ITBL- and control group.
Luminex test and DSA detection
Samples of recipients and donors were routinely and prospectively screened for anti-HLA antibodies using the Luminex (Luminex SA; One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA) single-antigen assay the test was carried out as per manufacture guidelines . The results of the DSA levels normalized for background are reported as the mean fluorescence index (MFI). MFI ≥ 2000 was considered positive for a single DSA.
The values reported are shown as the mean (SD) or median (inter quartile range). Proportions were compared using Fisher’s exact test or Chi square test. Quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test or T-tests. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Transplant and patient survival was determined using the Kaplan Meier survival curve.
Prevalence of HLA preoperatively
One ITBL-patient was preoperatively positive for HLA. In our control group there were three patients positive for HLA prior to OLT. This was statistically not significant p=0.224 (Table 3).
|ITBL group||Control group||p-value|
|preformed HLA class I||0||3||ns|
|preformed HLA||class II||0||1||ns|
Table 3: Preformed HLA pre OLT.
De novo DSA postoperatively
The ITBL-group was screened for a significantly high incidence of de novo DSA post OLT (Table 4) p=0.003. In total 46.7% of the ITBLpatients were postoperatively developed de novo DSA. No DSA were detected postoperatively in the control group.
|ITBL group (n=15)||Control group (n=15)||p-value|
|DSA class I||5||0||0,021|
|DSA class II||3||0||0,112|
Table 4: De novo DSA and NDSA post OLT.
In 33.3% of the ITBL patients DSA class I were detected (p=0.021). 20% of the ITBL patients showed DSA class II (p=112). Statistically only the presence of DSA class I was significant.
De novo NDSA
The control group had 46.7% increased incidence of de novo NDSA, whereas only 6.7% of all patients in the ITBL showed de novo NDSA (Table 4).
DSA and outcomes
The postoperative course showed significant differences concerning the postoperative interventions. ERC and stent implantations were needed in a significantly higher proportion in the ITBL-group than in the control group p=0.001 and p=0.021 (Table 5).
|postoperative variables||ITBL group (n=15)||control group (n=15)||p-value|
|ICU stay recipient||(days)||17,54 (19,69)||8,87 ( ± 6,63)||ns|
|ICU stay donor (days)||4,6 ( ± 3,87)||4,13 ( ± 4,57)||ns|
|Hospitalization||recipient (days)||55,6 ( ± 39,16)||48,00 ( ± 52,55)||ns|
|Normal t-drain visualization (5POD)||11||12||ns|
|Acute rejection (%)||40,00||60,00||ns|
Table 5: Results of the postoperative variables.
No statistical differences were found papillotomies (p=0,390), antibody mediated rejections (AMR) (p=0,466), the need for plasmapheresis (p=0,483) or steroid therapies (p=0,146).
Perioperative laboratory results
Patients were tested for GGT, ALAT, ASAT, and AP on day 1-7, 14, 21, and 28 postoperatively. Perioperative results showed a significant increase in AP in the ITBL group at multiple time points (Table 6). No statistical differences were found between the groups for ALAT, ASAT and GGT.
|Alkaline Phosphatase||ITBL group||Control group||p-value|
|M (± SE)||M (± SE)|
|Day 0, preoperative||261,08||(± 78,40)||164,87 (± 37,79)||0,259|
|Day 1||120,20||(± 23,764)||81,47 (± 8,36)||0,135|
|Day 2||117,20||(± 20,71)||79,80 (± 7,69)||0,101|
|Day 3||131,53||(± 22,49)||81,40 (± 6,18)||0,040|
|Day 4||148,67||(± 29,19)||83,60 (± 6,91)||0,039|
|Day 5||154,87||(± 29,33)||92,53 (± 8,72)||0,051|
|Day 6||143,27||(± 24,50)||120,46 (± 21,38)||0,496|
|Day 7||143,07||(± 21,58)||139,93 (± 28,28)||0,930|
|Day 14||253,57||(± 56,60)||233,46 (± 60,27)||0,810|
|Day 21||341,75||(± 58,56)||192,14 (± 43,06)||0,047|
|Day 28||402,45||(± 88,49)||249,90 (± 48,96)||0,137|
Table 6: AP perioperatively, day 0-28.
Transplant and patients’ survival
The transplants showed a cumulative 3-years-survival rate of 72.7% in the ITBL group vs. 73.3% in the control group. No significant difference was shown between both groups (Appendix). The cumulative patient survival rate 3-years post OLT was 72.7% in the ITBL group vs. 73.3% in the control group (Tables 7 and 8).
|Days post OLT||50||150||250||750||100|
Table 7: Patient survival post OLT, Kaplan Meyer Survival Curve, Log Rank P=0,999.
|Days post OLT||50||150||250||750||100|
Table 8: Transplant survival post OLT, Kaplan Meyer Survival Curve, Log Rank P=0,999.
Biliary complications are present with a constant incidence 10- 15% in patients after OLT . ITBL is one of the major postoperative complications accounting for up to 38% of morbidity and mortality rates of all biliary complications [12,13].
The impact DSA on the liver allograft remains controversial and patients are not regularly tested for DSA perioperatively. Recently, several groups have provided convincing evidence that DSA could be linked to poor liver allograft survival [14,15], chronic, ductopenic rejection , liver fibrosis  and biliary complications .
HLA class I and II are expressed on all cells in the liver and in a high density on endothelial cells. Hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells exclusively express MHC class I, antibody binding of class I DSA could therefore directly injure the transplant. HLA class II are exclusively found on dendritic cells, partly on macrophages and there is a low expression on portal microvasculature. They are up-regulated in case of infection, inflammation and ischemic injuries  and can activate endothelial, fibroblast and smooth muscle cell proliferation . Circulating immune complexes can then trigger inflammatory and fibrotic processes in small vessels of the biliary tree which lead to ischemic injuries [21,22].
Vascular and hepatocyte DSA could play an important role that favours the development of ITBL and biliary tree fibrosis. According to the timing of onset biliary complications post OLT can be divided into early and late. Two thirds of the patients manifest within the first three months post OLT . Biliary complications that present several months or years post OLT are intra- or extra hepatic fibrotic lesions, stricture mediated cholestasis and biliary insufficiency [23,24].
Studies in adult and pediatric patients post OLT showed an increased risk between DSA and fibrosis/cirrhosis [1,16,25,26]. Biliary strictures are increasingly seen in patients who are positive for DSA . In our study the ITBL group showed a significantly incidence of de novo DSA post OLT when compared to a matched control cohort, which could be detected even before the diagnosis of the ITBL.
Several studies were able to show the presence of DSA before the onset of transplant failure [14,15,27,28]. In pediatric OLT patients, those with DSA had a higher frequency of bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis, a higher frequency of diffuse/local endothelial C4d staining and mild or intermediate acute rejection compared to those with no DSA . Yamada et al. performed an immuno-histochemical study of 28 patients who had received a living-donor OLT suggesting an influence of DSA on the development of pericentral fibrosis . Del Bello et al. reported increased liver fibrosis in patients with DSA compared to those without DSA . Fontana et al. cohort had 4.2% with DSA. All DSA-positive patients developed biliary complications . 46.6% of the ITBL-patients presented with de novo DSA, demonstrating a ten times higher postoperative incidence of DSA than our or other control groups mentioned in other studies. These results show an important predisposition for DSA-positive patients for ITBL.
In the literature only few studies describe the NDSA-status of patients post OLT. A study described an NDSA incidence of 24% in a patient cohort post OLA without an association of biliary complications . In our study 46.7% of the patients in the control group showed NDSA whereas no NDSA were detected in the ITBL-group. Our results show that DSA are associated with biliary complications like ITBL whereas NDSA are not associated with biliary complications.
No differences were shown between the groups for the preoperative HLA-status.
AP is a sensitive marker in liver and biliary disease. According to Pascher et al. and Iacob et al. patients with biliary complications present with an elevated GGT, AP and transaminases [11,29]. Hilscher et al. described an asymptomatic elevation of AP in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis as a negative prognostic factor for the outcome and long term survival . According to Del Bello at al. DSA testing should be performed in patients with increased liver enzyme levels, alkaline phosphatase and graft dysfunction, especially in cases where immunosuppression is not optimal .
In our study an AP elevation in the ITBL group was already present during the initial postoperative hospital stay and before the actual diagnosis of ITBL had been made and could serve as a predictive marker for an early diagnosis in patients with a positive DSA status.
ERCs and stentings were significantly higher necessary in the ITBL group. The imaging of the t-drain 5 days postoperatively showed no differences. There was no significant association shown between DSA or NDSA and rejections.
The postoperative ICU and hospital stay did not differ between the groups. A model of explanation is the mean time to the diagnosis of ITBL of 235, 5 days. This point lies outside the mean duration of hospitalization and shows that the ITBL is not initially symptomatic in this patient cohort. It also shows the importance of tight long term controls, especially in the first year postoperatively even in an uneventful initial postoperative course.
Despite circulating DSA and the presence of ITBL we did not find clinical outcomes to be inferior in our ITBL-group. Survival rates of the transplant and the graft recipient was similar in both groups up to 3-years post OLT. Taner et al. reported similar findings in DSA positive patients in their study.
Nevertheless, given the possible long-term impact of the DSA, continued monitoring of the antibody levels is warranted in these patients. There is an association of DSA and the development of ITBL in OLT patients. De novo DSA in combination with an asymptomatic increase of AP are a potential diagnostic indicator for development of ITBL.
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.
The authors would like to thank Dr Rizwan Attia for the kind support in reviewing and editing this paper.
- Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Yoshizawa A, Uchida Y, Egawa H, Yurugi K, et al. (2012) Progressive graft fibrosis and donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in pediatric late liver allografts. Liver Transpl 18: 1333-1342.
- Iacob S, Cicinnati VR, Dechêne A, Lindemann M, Heinemann FM, et al. (2012) Genetic, immunological and clinical risk factors for biliary strictures following liver transplantation. Liver Int 32: 1253-1261.
- Saito T, Mizuta K, Hishikawa S, Kawano Y, Sanada Y, et al. (2009) Lymphocytotoxic crossmatch in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 13: 194-199.
- Goh A, Scalamogna M, De Feo T, Poli F, Terasaki PI (2010) Human leukocyte antigen crossmatch testing is important for liver retransplantation. Liver Transpl 16: 308-313.
- Loupy A, Suberbielle-Boissel C, Hill GS, Lefaucheur C, Anglicheau D, et al. (2009) Outcome of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies. Am J Transplant 9: 2561-2570.
- Haas M (2012) Pathologic features of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: an expanding spectrum. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 21: 264-271.
- Hodges AM, Lyster H, McDermott A, Rice AJ, Smith JD, et al. (2012) Late antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation following the development of de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibody. Transplantation 93: 650-656.
- Morrell MR, Patterson GA, Trulock EP, Hachem RR (2009) Acute antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 28: 96-100.
- Lachmann N, Terasaki PI, Budde K, Liefeldt L, Kahl A, et al. (2009) Anti-human leukocyte antigen and donor-specific antibodies detected by luminex posttransplant serve as biomarkers for chronic rejection of renal allografts. Transplantation 87: 1505-1513.
- Lachmann N, Todorova K, Schulze H, Schönemann C (2013) Luminex(®) and its applications for solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and transfusion. Transfus Med Hemother 40: 182-189.
- Pascher A, Gerlach U, Neuhaus P (2014) Bile duct strictures after liver transplantation. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 30: 320-325.
- Buck DG, Zajko AB (2008) Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 11: 51-59.
- Hansen T, Hollemann D, Pitton MB, Heise M, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. (2012) Histological examination and evaluation of donor bile ducts received during orthotopic liver transplantation--a morphological clue to ischemic-type biliary lesion? Virchows Arch 461: 41-48.
- Kozlowski T, Rubinas T, Nickeleit V, Woosley J, Schmitz J, et al. (2011) Liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection with demonstration of sinusoidal C4d staining and circulating donor-specific antibodies. Liver Transpl 17: 357-368.
- O'Leary JG, Kaneku H, Susskind BM, Jennings LW, Neri MA, et al. (2011) High mean fluorescence intensity donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies associated with chronic rejection Postliver transplant. Am J Transplant 11: 1868-1876.
- Musat AI, Agni RM, Wai PY, Pirsch JD, Lorentzen DF, et al. (2011) The significance of donor-specific HLA antibodies in rejection and ductopenia development in ABO compatible liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 11: 500-510.
- Taner T, Stegall MD, Heimbach JK (2014) Antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation: current controversies and future directions. Liver Transpl 20: 514-527.
- Fontana M, Moradpour D, Aubert V, Pantaleo G, Pascual (2010) M Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 23: 858-859.
- O'Leary JG, Demetris AJ, Friedman LS, Gebel HM, Halloran PF, et al. (2014) The role of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 14: 779-787.
- Zhang X, Reed EF (2009) Effect of antibodies on endothelium. Am J Transplant 9: 2459-2465
- Rull R, Garcia Valdecasas JC, Grande L, Fuster J, Lacy AM, et al. (2001) Intrahepatic biliary lesions after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int 14: 129-134.
- Ludwig J, Wiesner RH, Batts KP, Perkins JD, Krom RA (1987) The acute vanishing bile duct syndrome (acute irreversible rejection) after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 7: 476-483.
- Guichelaar MMJ, Benson JT, Malinchoc M, Krom RAF, Wiesner RH, et al. (2003) Risk factors for and clinical course of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 3: 885-890.
- Thethy S, Thomson BN, Pleass H, Wigmore SJ, Madhavan K, et al. (2004) Management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 18: 647-653.
- Del Bello A, Congy-Jolivet N, Muscari F, Lavayssière L, Esposito L, et al. (2014) Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant 14:867-875.
- Yamada H, Kondou H, Kimura T, Ikeda K, Tachibana M, et al. (2012) Humoral immunity is involved in the development of pericentral fibrosis after pediatric live donor liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 16: 858-865.
- Castillo-Rama M, Castro MJ, Bernardo I, Meneu-Diaz JC, Elola-Olaso AM, et al. (2008) Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility. Liver Transpl 14: 554-562.
- Muro M, Marin L, Miras M, Moya-Quiles R, Minguela A, et al. (2005) Liver recipients harbouring anti-donor preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies exhibit a poor allograft survival at the first year after transplantation: experience of one centre. Transpl Immunol 14: 91-7.
- Sanchez-Urdazpal L, Gores GJ, Ward EM, Hay E, Buckel EG, et al. (1993) Clinical outcome of ischemic-type biliary complications after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 25: 1107-1109.
- Hilscher M, Enders FB, Carey EJ, Lindor KD, Tabibian JH (2016) Alkaline phosphatase normalization is a biomarker of improved survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ann Hepatol 15: 246-253.