Journal of Soil Science & Plant Health

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Editorial, J Soil Sci Plant Health Vol: 7 Issue: 4

Regenerative Soil Practices: Building Healthy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture

Dr. Jacob Miller*

Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Prairie State University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Jacob Miller
Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Prairie State University, USA
E-mail: jmiller@psu.edu

Received: 01-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. JSPH-25-183605; Editor assigned: 4-Jun-2025, Pre-QC No. JSPH-25-183605 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jun-2025, QC No. JSPH-25-183605; Revised: 25-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. JSPH-25- 183605 (R); Published: 30-Jun-2025, DOI: 10.4172/jsph.1000239

Citation: Jacob M (2025) Regenerative Soil Practices: Building Healthy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture. J Soil Sci Plant Health 7: 239

Introduction

Soil health is the foundation of sustainable agriculture, influencing crop productivity, nutrient cycling, water retention, and ecosystem resilience. Modern farming practices, including intensive tillage, monocropping, and excessive chemical use, have degraded soils worldwide, reducing their fertility and capacity to support plant growth. Regenerative soil practices focus on restoring soil structure, enhancing organic matter, promoting biodiversity, and improving overall ecosystem function. By prioritizing long-term soil health, these practices not only increase productivity but also contribute to climate mitigation and environmental sustainability [1,2].

Discussion

A core principle of regenerative soil management is enhancing soil organic matter. Practices such as cover cropping, green manures, and the incorporation of compost or biochar increase carbon inputs, improve soil aggregation, and support microbial activity. Healthy soils with higher organic matter retain more water, resist erosion, and provide a more stable environment for plant roots and beneficial microorganisms [3,4].

Minimal or no-tillage systems are another key regenerative approach. Reducing soil disturbance preserves soil structure, protects soil biota, and maintains organic matter near the surface. These practices also reduce fuel consumption and labor costs while promoting a healthy soil ecosystem.

Biodiversity enhancement is central to regenerative soil strategies. Crop rotations, intercropping, and agroforestry systems increase plant diversity, which supports diverse microbial and faunal communities in the soil. Beneficial microbes, such as mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, improve nutrient availability, enhance disease resistance, and contribute to soil fertility over time [5].

Water management and erosion control are also integral. Mulching, contour farming, and maintaining permanent ground cover reduce surface runoff, prevent nutrient loss, and increase water infiltration. These measures improve soil resilience against droughts and extreme weather events, which are becoming more frequent due to climate change.

Regenerative soil practices not only restore soil health but also offer economic and environmental benefits. Enhanced soil fertility leads to higher and more stable yields, reducing dependency on chemical fertilizers. Additionally, these practices sequester carbon in soils, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and supporting climate-smart agriculture.

Conclusion

Regenerative soil practices provide a holistic approach to restoring degraded soils, improving productivity, and promoting ecological balance. By increasing organic matter, reducing disturbance, enhancing biodiversity, and improving water management, these strategies create resilient soil systems capable of sustaining long-term agricultural production. Widespread adoption of regenerative practices requires farmer education, policy support, and investment in research, but the benefits for soil health, food security, and climate resilience make it an essential pathway for sustainable agriculture.

References

  1. Rim D, Wallace LA, Nabinger S, Persily A (2012) Reduction of exposure to ultrafine particles by kitchen exhaust hoods: The effects of exhaust flow rates, particle size, and burner position. Sci Total Environ. 432: 350-56.

    Google Scholar, Crossref

  2. Singer BC, Pass RZ, Delp WW, Lorenzetti DM, Maddalena RL (2017) Pollutant concentrations and emission rates from natural gas cooking burners without and with range hood exhaust in nine California homes. Build Environ. 43:3235รข??42.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. WHO (2005) Air Quality Guidelines - Global update 2005.

  4. Kim H, Kang K, Kim T (2018) Measurement of particulate matter (PM2.5) and health risk assessment of cooking-generated particles in the kitchen and living rooms of apartment houses. Sustainability 10: 843.

    Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Liu Q, Son YJ, Li L, Wood N, Senerat AM, et al. (2022) Healthy home interventions: Distribution of PM2.5 emitted during cooking in residential settings. Build Environ 207: 108448.

    Google Scholar, Crossref

international publisher, scitechnol, subscription journals, subscription, international, publisher, science

Track Your Manuscript

Awards Nomination