Journal of Otology & RhinologyISSN: 2324-8785

Reach Us +1 850 754 6199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Otol Rhinol Vol: 4 Issue: 2

Parotidectomy by U-shaped Skin Incision for small Benign Tumors

Yasushi Furuta*, Takashi Tsubuku and Michiya Matsumura
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital,Sapporo, Japan
*Corresponding author : Dr. Yasushi Furuta, MD
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, 1-12 Maeda, Teine-ku, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan
Tel: +81-11-681-8111; Fax: +81-11-685-2998
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: August 28, 2014 Accepted: November 28, 2014 Published: March 12, 2015
Citation: Furuta Y, Tsubuku T, Matsumura M (2015) Parotidectomy by U-shaped Skin Incision for small Benign Tumors. J Otol Rhinol 4:2. doi:10.4172/2324-8785.1000216

Abstract

Parotidectomy by U-shaped Skin Incision for small Benign Tumors

Objectives: The facelift incision has been used as a more cosmetically favorable alternative to the traditional cervicofacial, S-shaped incision for parotidectomy. However, the facelift incision has the disadvantage of requiring a long skin incision and wide skin-flap elevation. As an alternative, we analyzed the application and safety of a more limited U-shaped skin incision for parotidectomy.

Methods: A U-shaped incision, consisting of pre- and postauricular incisions and a curved incision around the earlobe, was applied in 28 female patients. Their tumors were located in the superficial region of the parotid gland except one patient with a deep lobe tumor. Maximum diameter of the tumor was <3 cm. As a control, 18 patients with a S-shaped incision, who had superficial tumors <3 cm in diameter, were selected. Operative time and postoperative complications were retrospectively compared between the two incision approaches.

Results: No significant difference in operative time was observed between U-shaped incision and S-shaped incision. The frequencies of temporary facial paralysis and salivary fistula were comparable between the two surgical methods.

Conclusion: The U-shaped incision approach is feasible for parotidectomy in patients with small (<3 cm) benign tumors located in the superficial region of the parotid gland.

Keywords: Cosmetic approach; Facelift incision; Parotidectomy; Ushaped skin incision

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page

Media Partners

Associations