Journal of Womens Health, Issues and Care ISSN: 2325-9795

Reach Us +44-7480-724769
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Womens Health Issues Care Vol: 6 Issue: 1

Childbearing in Geographically Isolated Communities: The Smith Island Experience

Michele R. Davidson1*, Stephanie Armstrong2 and McClain Sampson3
1George Mason University, School of Nursing, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
3University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Corresponding author : Michele R. Davidson, PhD
CNM, CFN, RN, Associate Professor, George Mason University, School of Nursing, Fairfax, Virginia
Tel: 703-729-4462
Fax: 703-444-9878
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: December 15, 2015 Accepted: January 27, 2017 Published: February 02, 2017
Citation: Davidson MR, Armstrong S, Sampson MC (2017) Childbearing in Geographically Isolated Communities: The Smith Island Experience. J Womens Health, Issues Care 6:1. doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000262

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the childbearing beliefs and to describe the perspectives of pregnancy in women living on Smith Island, a geographically isolated community that lacks on-site obstetrical care services. Design: A qualitative exploratory, longitudinal focus group model consisting of two focus groups, conducted 6 years apart, that included 12 female participants was used. The focus group used open-ended questions regarding their childbirth experiences and the impact of geographic isolation and lack of healthcare access impacted them during the childbearing period. During the initial focus group, 60%multiparous and participated in a 70 minute interview. The second focus group contained only multiparous women and lasted 110 minutes. The timing interval represented the interval when another group of women had given birth. The study included 100% of women who were pregnant and subsequently gave birth who were living on the Island during the study period. Data collection and analysis were performed simultaneously and included: audio recordings with verbatim transcription, and subsequent coding using direct quotes from the participants. Findings: The majority of women identified acceptance of pregnancy as a safe, normal biological process and identified strong religious beliefs as the underlining factor for their perceptions. All women identified themselves as Methodist religion and “to be religious”. All of the women also identified anxiety, separation strain, and financial strain as normal components associated with pregnancy and childbearing in this remote island community. Of the women who had never given birth, all of them, and the majority of the multiparous women feared their family members, especially their husbands, would miss the actual birth due to geographic separation and feared being alone in labor and at the time of birth. Conclusions: The strong religious presence provided a foundation of acceptance of normalcy of childbearing. Women perceived their religious beliefs as a source of protection. They viewed childbirth as a rite of passage, but reported spending a great deal of time and financial resources on obtaining prenatal care. Separation strain occurred when the women were forced to be away from family and friends at the end of the pregnancy. Multiparous women with older children expressed a greater degree of stress in being separated from children and having to manage childcare and school issues. All of the women in the study had a fear that their husbands, working watermen, would missthe birth itself and that they would be alone at the time of birth.

Keywords: Rural maternity care; Smith Island; Geographic isolation; Childbearing

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page

Media Partners

Associations