Research Article, J Womens Health Issues Care Vol: 6 Issue: 5

Evaluation of Attitudes and Knowledge on Cervical Cancer among Women from Rural and Urban Areas of Romania

Ioan C Lancrajan¹, Ioan C Lisencu¹, Laurentiu F Ignat¹, Rares Trisca¹, Ioan D Topor², Madalina A Coman^3* and Floarea Mocean¹

¹Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

²Decembrie 1918 University, Alba-Iulia, Romania

³Department of Public Health, College of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania

*Corresponding Author : Madalina A. Coman
Department of Public Health, College of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Tel: (+40) 742115723; (+40) 264-402 215
Fax: (+40) 264-402 215
E-mail: madalina.coman@publichealth.ro

Received: August 10, 2017 Accepted: August 21, 2017 Published: August 25, 2017

Citation: Lancrajan IC, Lisencu IC, Ignat LF, Trisca R, Topor ID, et al. (2017) Evaluation of Attitudes and Knowledge on Cervical Cancer among Women from Rural and Urban Areas of Romania. J Womens Health, Issues Care 6:5. doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000284

Abstract

Keywords: Cervical cancer; HPV; Attitudes; Knowledge; Rural; Urban; Women

Introduction

Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent type of cancer which affects women at the global level. In 2012 there were 530,000 new cases of cervical cancer and 7.5% of the total number of deaths for women was due to this type of cancer [1]. Most cases of cervical cancer are recorded in developing countries, where this type of cancer represents about 85% of the total number of existent cancers [2]. Romania has the highest incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Europe, with the cervical cancer mortality rate being six times higher than the average for the countries of the European Union [3]. In Romania, cervical cancer is the third most prevalent type of cancer in women and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality among the female population. For women aged 15-44, cervical cancer is the main cause of death out of all the possible forms of cancer [3]. Out of the 33,882 new cases of cervical cancer reported annually in Eastern Europe, 4,343 are cases from Romania, and out of the 15,436 annual deaths owing to cervical cancer in Eastern Europe, 1,909 are recorded in Romania [3].

In Romania, the latest statistics collected at the end of 2008 have shown that only 2.5% from the target population have benefited from the HPV vaccine, and the vaccine administration rates have decreased in the following years [4,5].

In terms of screening, namely taking the Pap Test, statistics show that only 8.1% of women aged 25-64 have had the test in the last year, the rate being very low [3]. Studies made in this field show that this is due to lack of education, presenting screening programs in an inefficient manner, low health literacy, health inequalities and deterioration of the healthcare system [6-8].

In Romania, 45% of the total population lives in the rural areas, but, as far as we know, there is no existent data on the differences between the urban and the rural area with regard to women’s attitudes and knowledge on cervical cancer.

Taking this all into account, the aim of this article is to assess the attitudes and knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women in rural and urban areas of Romania.

Materials and Methods

The data was collected using a descriptive transversal study which was implemented online, over a period of 6 months between January and June 2015, the questionnaire was posted on Facebook and distributed via e-mail.

The e-mail addresses came from the database created for a previous study. The target group consisted of women aged 18-40. This target group was chosen for the reason that the women from this age category are the most predisposed to getting infected with the HPV virus because they are statistically more likely to be sexually active [1].

The study was approved the Ethics Committee of The Oncology Institute „Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricu�?�?�?�?”, Cluj-Napoca.

For statistical data analysis, R for Data Analysis and Graphics version 3.2.1 was used.

Results

The sample of the study included a number of 639 women (100%). Table 1 shows that the majority of participants, 508 cases (79.5%) come from the urban area, 484 cases (75.74%) have graduated from higher education, (44.06%) have a monthly income between 701-1500 RON (154 -328 EURO), and the mean age of the group was 28.66.

Table 1: Describing the target group.

Currently, out of the studied target group, 621 cases (97.18%) are sexually active, and 499 cases (79.21%) were sexually active upon completion of the questionnaire. The mean age of sexual debut was 18 years old. Most of the women participating in the study 447 cases (70%) had between 0-5 sexual partners up to the present moment. When asked about the frequency of gynecological consultations, 358 cases (59.37%) said that they go for consultations 1-2 times per year, and 66 cases (11%) claimed that they went very rarely (less than once a year). Out of the total number of respondents, 25 cases (5%) said that they have never had a gynecological consultation. Out of all the women surveyed, 624 cases (98.27%) knew what a Pap test was, and 423 cases (66.41%) have received a Pap test at least once in their lifetime. Regarding their knowledge about HPV, 413 cases (65.05%) believed that HPV was involved in the development of cervical cancer, while 222 cases (35%) thought that this virus is not responsible for the development of cervical cancer. A number of 435 (68.61%) respondents have heard of the existence of the HPV vaccine, and 396 (63.56%) would agree to vaccinate against the virus. The majority, 624 cases (97.96%) believed that getting the HPV vaccine would not spare them of having regular visits at the gynecologist.

As for women’s attitudes regarding cervical cancer, 432 cases (68.14%) believe that one visit to the gynecologist per year would prevent cervical cancer, while 202 (31.86%) respondents disagree with this affirmation. Also, 596 (94.3%) women think that organizing campaigns for informing the female population and introducing sexual education courses in schools would reduce the risk of cervical cancer among women in Romania. Moreover, 384 (60.54%) respondents have declared that they would like to redirect 2% of their state tax contribution to inform the population about cervical cancer prevention.

Table 2 shows the differences between residence area and knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer.

Table 2: The association between residence area and knowledge and attitudes on cervical cancer.

The probability of women getting screened for cervical cancer is 3.18 (95% CI 2.1 - 4.84) times higher for women living in the urban area than those living in the rural area, p<0.00. Regarding the information about the existence of a HPV vaccine which prevents cervical cancer, the probability of the women from the urban area knowing about this vaccine is 1.55 times (95% CI 1.02 - 2.36) higher in comparison to women living in the rural area, p<0.05.

Regarding women’s attitudes towards preventing cervical cancer by introducing sexual education courses in schools, the chance of them agreeing with this statement is 2.31 times (95% CI 1.04 - 4.91) higher for women living in the urban area, compared to those living in the rural area, p<0.05. As for women’s attitudes on introducing private health insurances to „force” women to test for early detection of cervical cancer, the chance of women from urban areas agreeing with this affirmation was 1.76 (95) % CI 0.99 - 3.08) higher compared to women from the rural area, p <0.05.

With regard to respondents’ attitudes towards medical education among women in Romania, the probability of women from urban area believing that a better medical education among young women in Romania can lead to preventing cervical cancer is 2.73 (95% CI 1.07 - 6.7) higher in comparison to the rural area, p<0.05.

Discussion and Conclusion

The findings of this study show that the vast majority of the female respondents (62.4 – 98.27%) have heard of the existence of the Pap test and the HPV, but approximately 30% (214 cases) have never taken the test and do not consider HPV responsible for cervical cancer. Compared to other studies, this percent was lower; for instance the percent of performing the Pap test is over 80% in countries such as Poland, France, Slovakia and Austria [9,10]. We recommend investing in screening programs, which decrease the rates of cervical cancer, improve the quality of life in the long term, and are the most efficient in preventing it [11,12]. These results are similar to the findings from previous studies, which show that approximately 40% of the population that is not informed of the risks of HPV and cervical cancer [5,13,14]. As for the differences regarding women from the rural area compared to those from the urban area, the findings of our study follow the same direction as the findings at the European and global level. These show that women in the rural area have a lower level of knowledge about cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine, and have performed the test in smaller numbers. They do not consider sexual education to be as important as the women in urban areas, and they have medical check-ups much later than the women from urban areas [15-17].

Following this study, there is information on the level of Pap test utilization for detecting cervical cancer, the level of knowledge of women from Romania about cervical cancer and HPV, and the attitudes that young women in Romania have towards cervical cancer and HPV. This study brings new evidence which can represent the basis for prevention campaigns, prevention programs and evidencebased public policies in order to reduce the burden of cervical cancer.

Acknowledgments

We kindly acknowledge Marisa Perry for proofreading and helping with the translation of this manuscript.

References

1. WHO (2014) Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. Geneva, Switzerland.
2. WHO (2012) Report of the HPV vaccine delivery meeting. Geneva, Switzerland.
3. HPV Information Centre (2016) Human papillomavirus and related diseases report. Romania.
4. Craciun C, Baban A (2012) “Who will take the blame?”: understanding the reasons why Romanian mothers decline HPV vaccination for their daughters. Vaccine 38: 6789-6793.
5. Pricopie R (2009) Policy dialog: the missing link in the 2008 Romanian human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 5: 92-109.
6. Baban A, Balázsi R, Bradley J, Rusu C, Szentágotai A (2005) Psychosocial and health system dimensions of cervical screening in Romania. Engender-Health, New York, USA.
7. Velikova N, Awad R, Coles-Gale E, Wright EP, Brown JM, et al. (2008) The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice –a qualitative study of patient and physician views. Psychooncology 17: 690-698.
8. Goldie S, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright T (2001) Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA 285: 3107-3115.
9. Eurostat: Statistics Explained (2017) Healthcare activities statistics - preventive services.
10. Nowakowski A, Cybulski M, �?�?liwczy�?�?ski A, Zbigniew T, Seroczy�?�?ski P, et al (2015) The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines. BMC Cancer 15: 279
11. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F (2015) The incremental benefits of implementing effective cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 138: 254-255.
12. Achimas-Cadariu P, Irimie A, Iancu M, Pop F, Lancrajan I, et al. (2013) Identification and validation of quality of life measures in a population of women with premalignant and malignant pathology at childbearing age. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies 13: 409-420.
13. Ekechi C, Olaitan A, Ellis R, Koris J, Amajuoyi A, et al. (2014) Knowledge of cervical cancer and attendance at cervical cancer screening: a survey of Black women in London. BMC Public Health 14: 1096.
14. Mann L, Foley K, Tanner A, Sun C, Rhodes S (2015) Increasing cervical cancer screening among US Hispanics/Latinas: A qualitative systematic review. J Cancer Educ 30: 374-387.
15. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R (2013) Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2: 35.
16. Todorova I, Baban A, Alexandrova-Karamanova A, Bradley J (2009) Inequalities in cervical cancer screening in Eastern Europe: perspectives from Bulgaria and Romania. Int J Public Health 54: 222-232.
17. Todorova I, Baban A, Balabanova D, Panayotova Y , Bradley J (2006) Providers’ constructions of the role of women in cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and Romania. Soc Sci Med 63: 776-787.