Journal of Pharmaceutics & Drug Delivery ResearchISSN: 2325-9604

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article,  J Pharm Drug Deliv Res Vol: 10 Issue: 10

Formulation and Evaluation of Microemulgel Containing Tizanidine Hydrochloride

Sanjay Kumar GN*, Lavanya Nallaguntla, Gururaj S Kulkarni

Department of pharmaceutics, The oxford college of pharmacy, Bangalore, 560068, Karnataka

*Corresponding Author:
Sanjay Kumar GN
Department of pharmaceutics,
The oxford college of pharmacy,
Bangalore, 560068,
Karnataka,
Tel: 8310279393;
Email: sanjaykumargn177@gmail.com

Received date: August, 23, 2021; Accepted date: November 18, 2021; Published date: November 29, 2021

Citation: Sanjay Kumar GN, Nallaguntla L, Kulkarni GS (2021) Formulation and Evaluation of Microemulgel Containing Tizanidine Hydrochloride. J Pharm Drug Deliv Res 10: 10.

Abstract

The transdermal applications of a drug to the oral mucosa offer the potential advantages of delivering the drug directly to the site of action and possibly delivering the drug for an extended period of time. Recently Microemulgel has emerged as one of the most interesting topical preparations pharmaceutics field. They are relatively free of serious side effects .The use of Microemulgel as a delivery system has several advantages such as thixotropic, easily spreadable, non-staining, emollient, bio-friendly, clear, transparent & elegant appearance, the objectives of this study was aimed to develop and formulate Tizanidine hydrochloride, as a skeletal muscle relaxant. Tizanidine hydrochloride is used for the treatment of painful muscle spasm, spinal cord injury and in the treatment of muscle spasticity in spinal cord disease.

Keywords: Tizanidine hydrochloride, Micro emulsion, Microemulgel, Transdermal delivery, skeletal muscle relaxant.

Introduction

Introduction to Transdermal Drug Delivery System [1-5]

Transdermal drug delivery system is a localized drug delivery system in the body which delivers the drug through various routes such as ophthalmic, rectal, vaginal and skin. Currently, transdermal drug delivery is one of the most promising methods for drug application. It avoids the first pass metabolism, gastrointestinal metabolic degradation and irritation associated with oral administration. Transdermal drug delivery system can be defined as direct application of formulation containing medication to the skin to get localized effect of drug. It is the potential route to deliver the drug producing low side effect in comparison with any other dosage forms. Drug concentration can be optimized to low concentration due to lack of metabolic elimination of drug before reaching the targeted site. There are many conventional dosage forms for transdermal applications as ointment, cream, gel, but they show fluctuation in bioavailability of drugs and are associated with other limitation as gel is limited to deliver the hydrophilic drugs, ointment is limited for hydrophobic drug. Recently there have been novel approaches in the transdermal delivery to control the fluctuation of drug, deliver in a controlled manner as per our need and to decrease the limitation associated with conventional preparation and to improve their properties for patient compliance. In developing a transdermal delivery system, two criteria are considered: one is achieving adequate flux across the skin and the other is minimizing the lag time in skin permeation. One strategy overcoming this constraint is the incorporation of various chemical skin enhancers into the vehicle. Another strategy is a choice of an appropriate vehicle that corresponds to the drug being used for the dermal route of administration.

Advantages of Tdds

• Avoidance of first pass metabolism
• Avoidance of gastro intestinal incompatibility
• Predictable and extended duration of activity
• Minimizing undesirable side effects
• Provides utilization of drugs with short biological half life
• Narrow therapeutic window
• Improving physiological and pharmacological response
• Avoidance the fluctuation in drug levels
• Termination of therapy is easy at any point of time
• Greater patient compliance due to elimination of multiple dosing profile
• Ability to deliver drug more selectively to a specific site
• Provide suitability for self-administration
• Enhance therapeutic efficacy

Limitations of Tdds

• Unsuitable for drugs that irritate or sensitize the skin
• cannot deliver in a pulsatile fashion
• Cannot deliver large doses of drugs through skin
• cannot administer drugs that require high blood levels
• May cause irritation or sensitization
• Not practical, when the drug is extensively metabolized in the skin and when molecular size is great enough to prevent the molecules from diffusing through the skin
• Not suitable for a drug, which doesn’t possess a favourable , O/W partition coefficient
• The barrier functions of the skin changes from one site to another on the same person, from person to person and with age.
• Skin irritation on contact dermatitis may occur due to the drug or excipients.

The Human Skin

One highly successful alternative delivery method is transdermal delivery. To deliver a drug into the body through transdermal layer of skin, it is necessary to understand about the skin.

The skin is the outer covering of the body. In humans, it is the largest organ of the integumentary system made up of multiple layers of epithelial tissues and guards the underlying muscles, bones, ligaments and internal organs. For the average adult human, the skin has a surface area between 1.5 to 2 m2 (16.1-21.5 sq ft), most of it is between 2.3mm (0.10 inch) thick. The average square inch (6.5cm2) of skin holds 650 sweat glands, 20 blood vessels, 60,000 melanocytes and more than a thousand nerve endings. It performs several essential functions. The different layers of the human skin are shown in fig 1.

Anatomy of the Skin

Structurally, the skin consists of two principle parts. The outer thinner portion, which is composed of epithelium, is the epidermis. The epidermis is attached to the inner thicker, connective tissue part called the dermis. Beneath the dermis is a subcutaneous layer. This layer is also called the superficial fascia or hypodermis. It consists of areole and adipose tissues. Fibers from the dermis extend down into the subcutaneous layer and anchor the skin to it. The subcutaneous layer in turn attaches to underlying tissues and organs.

Figure 1: Anatomy of Human skin

Epidermis

In the word epidermis, “epi’ came from the Greek meaning “over” or “upon”. It is the outermost layer of the skin. It forms the water proof, protective wrap over the body’s surface and is made up of stratified squamous epithelium with an underlying basal lamina. It contains no blood vessels and cells in the deepest layer are nourished by diffusion from blood capillaries extending to the upper layers of the dermis.

Dermis

Dermis is 3 to 5mm thick layer and is composed of a matrix of connective tissue, which contains blood vessels, lymph vessels and nerves. The cutaneous blood supply has essential function in regulation of body temperature. It also provides nutrients and oxygen to the skin while removing toxins and waste products. Capillaries reach to within 0.2 mm of skin surface and provide sink conditions for most molecules penetrating the skin barrier. The blood supply thus keeps the dermal concentration of a permeant very low and the resulting concentration difference across the epidermis provides the essential concentration gradient for transdermal permeation. It contains hair follicles, sweat gland, sebaceous glands, apocrine glands, lymphatic vessels and blood vessels.

Hypodermis

The hypodermis or subcutaneous fat tissue supports the dermis and epidermis. It serves as a fat storage area. This layer helps to regulate temperature, provides nutritional support and mechanical protection. It carries principle blood vessels and nerves to skin and may contain sensory pressure organs. For transdermal drug delivery, drug has to penetrate through all these three layers and reach into systemic circulation while in case of topical drug delivery only penetration through stratum corneum is essential and then retention of drug in skin layers is desired. It consists of loose connective tissue and elastic. The main cell types are fibroblasts, macrophages and adipocytes.

Introduction to Micro emulsions

In 1943, Hoar and Schulman visualized the existence of small emulsion- like structures by electron microscopy and subsequently coined the term “microemulsions”.

Micro emulsions are thermodynamically stable isotropically clear dispersion of two immiscible liquids, such as oil and water, stabilized by an interfacial film of surfactant molecules, with a size range of 5-200 nm and have very low interfacial tension. Because of their unique solubilization properties, micro emulsion have attracted increasing attention as potential drug delivery systems, either as vehicles for topical applications or as bioavailability enhancers for poor water soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (API). The existence of microdomains of different polarity within the same single-phase solution enables both hydrophilic and lipophilic materials to be solubilized. Advantages associated with microemulsions include their thermodynamic stability, optical clarity, ease of preparation, and high diffusion and absorption rates when compared with solvent without the surfactant system.

Figure 2: Microemulsion

Introduction to Microemulgel

A new approach in the field of topical drug delivery is introduced to deliver the hydrophilic drug that can enjoy the gelling property and whose rate can be controlled named Microemulgel. Even though microemulsions offer several advantages for topical delivery, it is difficult to stabilize the system because of low viscosity. This problem can be overcome by formulating microemulsion-based gel It is simply the preparations where microemulsion of the drug is prepared and are incorporated in the gel. Microemulgel are transparent and thermodynamically stable as their droplet size range from 10-100 nm. They have the combined advantage of both microemulsion and gel. Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs can be incorporated into the dosage form.They provide a large surface area for drug absorption and oil portion increases the bioavailability by improving permeability of drugs. Microemulgel for dermatological use have several advantages like thixotropic, greaseless, easily spreadable, easily removable, emollient, non-staining, long shelf life, bio-friendly, transparent and pleasing appearance.

Figure 3: Microemulgel

Advantages of Microemulgel

• Hydrophobic drugs can be easily incorporated into gels using o/w Micro emulsions
• Better stability
• Better loading capacity
• Production feasibility and low preparation cost
• No intensive sonication
• Prolongs the release of the drug
• Used for both hydrophobic (o/w microemulgel) and hydrophilic drugs (w/o micro-emulsion).

Disadvantages of Microemulgel

• Drugs of large particle size are not easy to absorb through the skin
• skin irritation on contact dermatitis
• possibility of allergenic reactions
• Occurrence of the bubble during the formulation of Microemulgel.

Ideal properties of Microemulgel:

• Should be inert, compatible with other additives
• Should be free from microbial contamination
• Should be non-toxic
• Should be economical
• Should be maintained all rheological properties of the gel
• Should be washed with water and free from staining nature
• Should be convenient in handling and its application
• Should be stable at storage condition

Materials and Methods

Materials

Tizanidine hydrochloride was received as a gift sample from Symed labs, Telangana. India. Oleic acid, Isopropyl alcohol, Triethanolamine was received from S.D Fine chem. Ltd. Mumbai, India. Tween 80 and carbopol 934 obtained from Rolex chemical industries, Mumbai, India. And HPMC K 100-M obtained from Yarrow chem, products, mumbai, India.

Screening of Oil, Surfactant and Co-surfactant

Saturation solubility of drug in various oils (olive oil, oleic acid, castor oil , arachis oil , olive oil and liquid paraffin), surfactant (tween 80, tween 20, Span 80 and span 20) and co-surfactant (propylene glycol Isopropyl alcohol , polyethylene glycol – 400, Ethanol ) was determined. Excess of tizanidine hydrochloride was added to 5 ml of each oil, surfactant and co-surfactant. It was stirred for 48 hours on a magnetic stirrer at 500 rpm at room temperature. The solutions were then filtered through Whatman filter paper and scanned by UV spectrophotometer at λmax 228 nm. The experiments were repeated in triplicate. The solubility of drug in solvents was determined in mg/ml.

Construction of Pseudo Phase Diagram

Pseudo-ternary phase diagrams was constructed for obtaining concentration range of components for existing Micro emulsion regions by using Chemix School ternary diagram software.

The surfactant and co-surfactant used were Tween 80 and Isopropyl alcohol. The pseudo-ternary phase diagrams of oil, surfactant, cosurfactant, and water were constructed using water titration method to obtain the components and their concentration ranges that can results in large existence area of micro emulsion. Surfactant was blended with co-surfactant in fixed weight ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:3, 2:1 and 3:1). Aliquots of each surfactant and co-surfactant mixture (Smix) were then mixed with oil at room temperature. For each phase diagram, the ratios of oil to Smix were varied as 1: 9, 2:8, 3:7, 4: 6, 5:5, 6:4, 7:3, 8:2, and 9:1 (w/w). Water was added drop wise to each mixture under vigorous stirring by using magnetic stirrer. No heating was done during the preparation. Then, each mixture was visually observed for transparency. The samples were marked as points in the phase diagram. The area covered by these points was considered as the microemulsion region of existence.

Formulation Tizanidine Hydrochloride (mg) Oleic acid
( ml )
Tween 80
( ml )
Isopropyl alcohol (ml) Water
 ( ml )
Ratio of Smix
   ( ml )
ME-1 10 2 2.5 2.5 3 01:01
ME-2 10 2 5 2 4.5 03:01
ME-3 10 2 2 5 4 01:03
ME-4 10 2 3.54 1.77 3.3 02:01
ME-5 10 2 1.77 3.54 4.7 01:02

Table 1: Composition of the selected microemulsion formulations.

Formulation of Microemulsion

0.1 % of drug was weighed accurately and dissolved in oil by stirring on a magnetic stirrer. Water and surfactant were mixed together. This mixture was then added drop-wise to an oily solution of drug and mechanically stirred to form an emulsion. Co-surfactant was added drop wise to the emulsion. Formation of the transparent solution indicated the formation of Microemulsion.

Evaluation of Microemulsion

The prepared Microemulsion was evaluated for the following parameters:

% Transmittance Measurement

Microemulsion was diluted 100 times with distilled water. % transmittance of formulation was measured using UV Visible spectrophotometer at 228 nm wavelength against continuous phase (pH buffer of 5.5 ) as blank.

Particle Size Measurement

Particle size determination: Particle size of optimized microemulsion formulations were determined by dynamic light scattering Malvern Zetasizer. Sample preparation was done by diluting 0.1ml of microemulsion in distilled water i.e. dispersion medium.

Zeta Potential Measurement

Malvern Zeta Sizer (Malvern Instruments, UK) was used to measure the zeta potential of the globules. Samples were placed in clear disposable zeta cell and results were recorded.

Dilution Test

This test was carried out to find out which type of microemulsion was formed. The prepared microemulsion was diluted with water which was external /continuous phase.

Electro conductivity measurement

Electrical conductivity of MEs was measured with a conductivity meter for testing microemulsion type using conductivity cells with a cell constant of 1.0 and consisting of two platinum plates separated by desired distance and having liquid between the platinum plate acting as a conductor.

pH

The pH meter was calibrated with standard buffer solution having pH 4 and 7 before use.

And then prepared Microemulsion formulations was dissolved in distilled water and stirred until it forms uniform suspension, kept it aside for 2 hr. The volume made up to 100 ml and pH of the suspension can be measure with the digital pH meter. The measurements of pH of each formulation were performed in triplicate.

Density

Density was measured using a specific gravity bottle (density bottle). Weight of empty specific gravity bottle was noted as W1, weight of specific gravity bottle with distilled water noted as W2 and weight of specific gravity bottle with microemulsion was noted down as W3.

It can be calculated by the formula

Equation

Viscosity

Brookfield programmable DVII+ Model pro II type viscometer was used for viscosity studies. The prepared microemulsion formulations (100 ml) were placed in a beaker and were allowed to equilibrate for 5 minutes before measuring the dial reading using spindle No. 62 at a speed of 50 rpm.

Centrifugation

This is used to specify the stability of the microemulsion whether it is monophasic or not. The prepared microemulsion was centrifuged at ambient temperature at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes to evaluate the system for creaming or phase separation. The microemulsion was observed visually for appearance.

Drug content

The drug content was determined by dissolving amount of the formulation equivalent to 10 mg of active drug in 100ml of phosphate buffer pH 5.5. The volumetric flasks were kept for 2 hour over a rotary shaker to mix it properly. The solution was filtered and drug content was measured spectrophotometrically at 228 nm.

In-vitro drug release studies

The in vitro drug release studies were performed by using Franz diffusion cell with cellophane paper. The water jacketed recipient compartment had total capacity of 25 ml and it had 2 arms, one for sampling and another for thermometer. The donor compartment had internal diameter of 2 cm. The donor compartment was placed in such a way that it just touches the diffusion medium in receptor compartment. The receptor compartment contained phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) that was maintained at 37°C ± 1°C. The membrane was equilibrated before application of the microemulsion equivalent to 10 mg of drug onto the donor side. 5ml of Samples were periodically withdrawn from the receptor compartment, replacing with the same amount of fresh Phosphate buffer pH 5.5 solutions, and assayed by using a spectrophotometer at 228 nm.

Figure 4: Formation of Microemulgel

Sl. No Ingredients ( % w/w) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9
1     Tizanidine    0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
    Hydrochloride
2      Oleic acid 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
3      Tween 80 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4    Isopropyl alcohol   1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
             
5    Carbopol 934 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.7
6     HPMC K-100m  0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 1 1
7    Triethanolamine 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8         Water q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s q.s

Table 2: Microemulsion based gel formulation table.

Development of Microemulsion Based Gel

Carbopol 934 and HPMC K100 M polymers were used as a gelling agent in the formulation of microemulsion based gel. Both the polymers were soaked separately in water for 24 hours. They were mixed to form gel phase. The prepared microemulsion was then added to the gel phase to form microemulsion based gel and mixed until the smooth, elegant gel was obtained.

Evaluation of Microemulgel

The Prepared Microemugel was evaluated for the following parameters:

• Physical examination
• Extrudability test
• Syneresis measurement
• pH
• Spreadability test
• Rheological study
• Drug content
Invitro diffusion study

Physical Examination

Prepared microemulsion based emulgel was checked for their colour, and consistency.

Extruability test

It is test performed to determine the force required to extrude the material from tube. The formulations were filled in the collapsible tubes. The extruability of the formulation was determined in terms of weight required to extrude 0.5 cm ribbon of microemulgel in 10 second .When more quantity is extruded, extrudability is considered to be better. The percentage of gel extruded was calculated and recorded.

Syneresis measurement

After microemulgel was visually inspected, it was tested for any possible phase separation. Upon standing, gel sometimes shrinks and little liquid is pressed out. This phenomenon is called syneresis. It is expressed as percent syneresis. This test involves the use of a centrifuge machine. The formulation was added in a cylindrical tube which had a perforated bottom which was covered with Whatman filter paper. The tube was placed in the centrifuge and centrifuged for 15 minutes. Tube and liquid separated from microemulgel were weighed. Percent syneresis was calculated using formula.

Equation

pH

The pH value of Microemulgel formulation can be measured by using pH meter (Digital pH meter). The pH meter was calibrated with standard buffer solution having pH 4 and 7 before use. And then the 1% aqueous solution of the prepared Microemulgel can be made. 1 gm of formulation was dissolved in distilled water and stirred until it forms uniform suspension, kept it aside for 2 hr. The volume made up to 100 ml and pH of the suspension can be measured with the digital pH meter. The measurements of pH of each formulation were performed in triplicate.

Spreadability Test

Spreadability was performed by using two glass slides of length 7.5 cm. 350 mg of microemulgel was weighed accurately and it was taken on one glass slide. Another glass slide was placed above it from a height of 5 cm. A weight of 5 gm was kept on the upper slide and after 1min; diameter of circle that was spread was noted in cm. The observed .

Viscosity

Brookfield DV-II + Pro viscometer was employed for measurement of viscosity. Approximately 1g of microemulgel was taken on the plate of Brookfield viscometer and it was allowed to settle for 5-10 min and then spindle 62 was placed on the plate containing gel and rotated at a speed of 50 rpm with the help of spindle. The temperature was maintained at 25°C and corresponding dial reading was noted down. Reading indicates the viscosity of the formulations in cps.

Drug Content

Determination of drug content is necessary to evaluate the uniform distribution of drug in the formulation. It ensures a minimum batch to batch variation. Tizanidine hydrochloride content in microemulgel was determined by dissolving the known quantity of formulation in phosphate buffer pH 5.5 by sonication. The solution was stirred for 3-4 hours on magnetic stirrer to ensure complete dissolution of formulation in methanol. Later, the solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper. Their absorbance was measured at 228 nm using diameter indicates the type of gel UV Visible spectrophotometer. All the experiments were performed In triplicate.

In-vitro Diffusion Study

In-vitro drug release study of Microemulgel was carried out in a modified Franz diffusion cell using Cellophane membrane. Cellophane membrane (cut to suitable size) was stored in phosphate buffer pH 5.5 for 12 hours before use and was placed in between donor and receptor compartment.1g of Tizanidine hydrochloride microemulgel was spread on cellophane membrane. The entire surface of membrane containing formulation was in contact with receptor compartment containing 100 ml of phosphate buffer pH 5.5 Cell was agitated on a magnetic stirrer at 50 rpm and the temperature of receptor medium was maintained at 37 ± 1°C. Aliquots of 5 ml were withdrawn at predetermined intervals up to 480 minutes. The absorbance of samples was measured at 228 nm . All the experiments were performed in triplicate.

Drug-Excipient Compatibility Studies

Assessing the possible incompatibility between active ingredients and various excipients is an important part of the pre-formulation stage of the formulation development process. The use of FTIR technique allows pointing out the implication of the different functional groups of drug and excipients by analyzing the significant changes in the shape and position of the absorbance bands.

The FTIR used here is Bruker Alpha II FTIR spectrometer with a Zinc Selenide Crystal ATR (Attenuated Total internal Reflectance) accessory. The measurement of liquid and solid samples can be performed directly, without the need for salt plates or special sample processing. The spectrometer is operated using software Opus 7.8.

Procedure: Samples are placed directly on the Zinc selenide crystal plate. For a solid sample apply enough powder to coat the crystal with approximately 1 mm thickness of material. Position the pressure arm over the sample and apply pressure to the sample.

Here transmission of the IR radiation through the sample is not measured; we are measuring how much the IR radiation is attenuated by the sample. The sample is placed on a crystal with a high refractive index. The intensity of the incident rays is known. When the light rays strike the interface between the Zinc selenide crystal and the sample, they undergo total internal reflectance. An evanescent wave travels beyond the surface of the crystal into the sample approximately 0.5 to 5 μm before being refracted back into the crystal. This is why the sample must be in tight contact with the crystal. The evanescent wave will be attenuated in regions where the sample absorbs IR radiation. The spectral range is 4000 – 400 cm-1. The IR beam exits at the opposite end of the crystal and passes to the detector which measures the attenuation. Thus, unlike a transmittance spectrum which is showing the % transmittance of IR light, this shows the amount of IR energy that is absorbed. But there is a button for converting between absorbance and transmittance. Clicking on the indicated button will convert the spectrum into the traditional transmission spectrum appearance.

Kinetics of Drug release

To study the kinetics and mechanism of drug release, the release data of the in- vitro diffusion study of Tizanidine hydrochloride microemulgel formulaions were fitted in various kinetic models.

Stability study

Stability study for the optimised batch was carried out as per ICH guidelines. Short term accelerated stability of gel was carried at 40°C ± 2°C /75% ± 5% RH for 3 months. The microemulgel formulation were tested and checked at regular intervals for changes in Physical appearance, consistency, pH ,viscosity , Spreadability , and drug content.

Results and discussion

Sl no                   Solvent          Solubility ( mg/ml )
1 Distilled water 1.23
2 Methanol 1.41
3 Phosphate buffer pH 5.5 3.67
4 Chloroform 0.89
5 Ether 0.74

Table 3: Solubility studies of drug in various solvents

Sl. No. Oils Solubility (mg/ml)
1 Olive oil 2.7
2 Arachis oil 1.93
3 Castor oil 1.62
4 Oleic acid 3.46
5 Liquid paraffin 2.95

Table 4: Solubility of Tizanidine hydrochloride in various oils.

Sl. no. Surfactants Solubility (mg/ml)
1 Tween 20 2.92
2 Tween 80 4.33
3 Span 80 1.951
4 Span 20 1.69

Table 5: Solubility of Tizanidine hydrochloride in various surfactants.

Sl. no. Co-surfactants Solubility (mg/ml)
1 Propylene glycol 2.9
2 Isopropyl alcohol 3.21
3 Polyethyenene glycol 400 2.11
4 Ethanol 1.78

Table 6: Solubility of Tizanidine hydrochloride in various co-surfactants.

Among surfactants Tween 80 having highest solubility and was selected as a surfactant in tizanidine hydrochloride microemulsion formulation. The drug tizanidine hydrochloride showed maximum solubility in oleic acid among various oils. Among all studied surfactants, Tizanidine hydrochloride showed maximum solubility in tween 80 and Propylene glycol showed maximum solubility among co-surfactant.

Construction of Pseudo-ternary phase diagrams:

Largest transparent microemulsion region was found with Smix ratio 1:2 and therefore it was selected for preparation of microemulsion.

Equation

Equation

Drug-excipient compatibility studies:

Figure 5: IR band of Tizanidine hydrochloride

Figure 6: IR band of Tizanidine hydrochloride drug + oleic acid + tween 80 + Isopropyl alcohol + Carbopol 934 + HPMC K -100M + Triethanolamine

Evaluation of Microemulsion

% Transmittance

Percentage transmittance was used as one of the responses to optimize the amount of Smix and oil to get the desired microemulsion. All five batches showed good transmittance proving transparency of the Microemulsion. The microemulsion (ME-5) showed maximum 5 transparencies of 97.9%. (Table 7)

Particle Size Measurement

Particle size of microemulsion ME-5 was found to be 198.8 nm , which did not show a conclusive pattern to correlate with formulation components.

Figure 7: particle size of ME-5

Zeta Potential

The zeta potential of optimized ME-5 was found to be-34.5 mV, the negative zeta potential indicates that globules of microemulsion had no charge, that is, the system was stable. As there was no charge on globules, no flocculation of globules occurred and hence, microemulsion was found to be stable.

Figure 8: Zeta potential graph of Microemulsion ME-5

Conductivity Measurement

The conductivity of microemulsion ME-1 – ME-5 was found in between 0.067 – 0.136 Ms/cm. From the electro-conductivity study it can be concluded that the five batches are of O/W type. (Table 7)

Centrifugation

All the 5 microemulsion batches not shown any phase separation which indicates that it has a good stability. (Table 7)

Formulation Code % Transmittance Conductivity (mS/cm) Centrifugation
ME-1 95.4±0.251 0.136 No phase separation
ME-2 96.7±0.220 0.134 No phase separation
ME-3 96.3±0.226 0.105 No phase separation
ME-4 97.6±0.158 0.067 No phase separation
ME-5 97.9±0.208 0.125 No phase separation

Table 7: Evaluation of % transmittance, conductivity and centrifugation.

Ph

PH of microemulsion (ME-1 to ME-5) was found to be in the range of 6.6 to 5.7. (Table 8)

Density

All the 5 microemulsion formulations showed density close to 1 g/ml. (Table 8)

Viscosity

The viscosity of microemulsion formulations ME-1 to ME-5 were found in between 2934 to 4495 cps. (Table 8)

Drug Content

The drug content for the Tizanidine hydrochloride microemulsions was ranging from 98.45 ± 0.281 % to 82.86 ± 0.989 %.( Table 8)

Formulation pH Density Viscosity (cps) Drug content
(g/ml)
ME-1 5.7±0.305 0.357 4495 ± 21.82 82.86 ± 0.989
ME-2 6.4±0.360 0.36 3864 ± 24.78 91.17 ± 0.354
ME-3 5.9±0.325 0.372 4107 ± 17.57 87.88 ± 0.507
ME-4 6.1±0.257 0.387 3267 ± 15.52 96.29 ± 0.848
ME-5 6.6±0.342 0.381 2934 ± 17.24 98.45 ± 0.281

Table 8: Evaluation of pH, density, viscosity and drug content.

Invitro Drug Release

% Drug release of microemulsion formulations ME-1 to ME- 5 were found to be in the range of 98.30 ± 0.883 to 7.57 ± 0.900.Among the 5 microemulsion formulations ME-5 has shown maximum drug release of 98.30 ± 0.883 % compared to other formulations.

TIME % DRUG RELEASE
(min) ME-1 ME-2 ME-3 ME-4 ME-5
0 0 0 0 0 0
15 6.16 ± 1.182 5.66 ± 1.163 6.08 ± 0.612 5.78 ± 0.558 7.57 ± 0.900
30 28.87  ± 1.060 18.96  ± 0.503 28.79 ± 0.794 30.50 ±0.423 29.12 ± 0.815
45 44.63 ± 0.969 41.21 ± 1.500 45.48 ± 0.818 54.30 ±1.872 43.67 ± 2.403
60 63.38 ± 0.538 58.70 ± 1.563 63.25 ± 1.058 65.39 ±4.526 57.37 ± 2.752
90 75.50 ± 1.272 82.27 ± 1.864 78.31 ± 1.228 76.19 ±1.488 78.97 ± 3.191
120 85.86 ± 0.317 92.31 ± 0.471 88.23 ± 0.956 95.84 ±0.513 98.30 ± 0.883

Table 9: Invitro drug release of microemulsion.

Evaluation of Microemulgel

Physical Examination

Microemulgel was found to be white, viscous and smooth in consistency.

F1, F2 and F4 formulations were found to have very good consistency and smooth appearance compared to other formulations.

Extrudability Test

Extrudability of F1, F2, F3 and F4 formulations were found to be better than other formulations. (Table 10)

% Syneresis Measurement

% Syneresis of microemulgel was found to be very less which indicates that microemulgel showed stability at room temperature. (Table 10)

Formulation Extrudability(%) % Syneresis
F1                      92.59± 2.9 3.34 ± 0.48
F2 95.71 ± 4.3 1.63 ± 0.62
F3 94.23 ± 3.8 1.89 ± 0.43
F4 97.66±4.1 2.44 ± 0.74
F5 89.81 ±4.6 3.78 ± 0.67
F6 88.04 ±4.2 2.91 ± 0.93
F7 86.32 ±4.5 4.47 ± 0.41
F8 83.29 ± 5.3 3.18 ± 0.53
F9 81.24 ± 5.6 1.93 ± 0.39

Table 10: Evaluation of extrudability and syneresis.

ph

The pH of the topical formulations should be compatible with skin pH. A change in the pH may cause irritation or disruption of skin. The pH of all formulations was modified and when measured, it was found between 5.7 and 6.5, which is acceptable for skin preparations. (Table 11)

Spreadability Test

The values of spreadability indicate that the gel is easily spreadable on the application of a small amount of shear and spreadability was found to be in the range of 14.7 to 13.2gm.cm/sec. (Table 11)

Rheological Study

Viscosity of the Tizanidine microemulgel was found to be between 7585 ± 8.504 to 9516 ± 17.38 cps (Table 11)

Drug Content

The drug content was found to be in the range of 94.27 ± 1.838 to 75.21 ± 0.372%. Formulation F1 has shown maximum drug content among all other batches (Table 11)

Formulation Code  pH Spreadability Viscosity (cps) Drug content %
(gm.cm/s)
F1 6.5 ± 0.208 14.7 ± 0.171 7585 ± 8.504 94.27 ± 1.838
        91.78 ± 1.230
F2 6.4 ± 0.159 14.4  ± 0.251 7917 ± 11.015
 F3 6.2 ± 0.231 14.2 ± 0.143 8183 ± 11.532 88.77 ± 1.389
F4 6.1 ± 0.217 13.9 ± 0.248 8261 ± 11.583 87.08 ± 1.492
F5 5.9 ± 0.351 13.8  ± 0.203 8396 ± 8.185 84.36 ± 1.568
F6 5.8 ± 0.358 13.5 ± 0.159 8453 ± 14.730 82.67 ± 0.923
F7 5.8 ± 0.264 13.4  ± 0.236 8786 ± 9.165 80.93 ± 0.848
  F8 5.7 ± 0.152 13.4 ± 0.252 9129± 13.051 79.90 ± 0.775
F9       75.21 ± 0.372
5.5 ± 0.174 13.2 ± 0.178 9516 ± 17.385

Table 11: Determination of pH ,Spreadability, viscosity and drug content of microemulgel.

In-vitro diffusion study:

Among the 9 microemulgel formulations, F1 has shown maximum drug release of 97.36 ± 1.41 %. (Table 12, 13)

TIME % DRUG RELEASE
(min) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5
0 0 0 0 0 0
15 3.50 ± 0.742 3.38 ±0.798 3.04±0.572 4.11±0.308 5.28±0.318
30 7.08 ± 1.333 8.01 ±1.741 6.83±1.096 9.60±0.423 11.38±1.343
45 14.35 ± 1.132 14.76 ±2.818 12.08±1.599 17.25±0.702 20.05±0.797
60 19.37 ± 2.092 19.36 ±1.255 18.60±2.374 25.13±2.696 27.77±2.630
90 27.52 ± 0.745 28.35 ±3.560 26.39±3.617 33.55±3.654 34.37±2.711
120 35.93 ± 1.799 36.67 ±3.772 33.98±4.292 43.86±4.233 42.49±3.004
180 44.84 ± 1.883 43.76 ±2.755 44.03±6.326 54.86±6.525 57.79±8.235
240 57.76 ± 2.256 59.81 ±4.668 56.14±3.735 62.09±7.559 60.97±1.525
300 64.91 ± 1.464 67.86 ±4.170 65.22±3.999 68.35±6.765 69.97±3.081
360 76.58 ± 1.459 76.69 ±1.732 76.07±3.290 77.42±4.121 78.11±1.796
420 89.32 ± 1.265 86.03 ±6.152 87.66±4.483 85.58±2.025 84.64±1.135
480 97.36 ± 1.415 94.41 ±0.702 93.17±2.000 91.11±0.522 89.63±0.440

Table 12: invitro drug release table of Microemulgel formulations (F1 – F5).

TIME   % DRUG RELEASE
(min) F6 F7 F8 F9
0 0 0 0 0
15 7.45 ±0.638 5.43±0.870 8.17±0.561 8.50±0.540
30 12.62 ±2.248 12.07±2.097 12.99±1.117 16.84±1.085
45 21.39 ±0.983 20.18±2.847 21.50±1.186 24.16±0.278
60 28.49 ±2.819 26.98 ± 4.133 29.60±2.579 32.57±0.137
90 36.99 ±4.008 36.10±4.803 36.72±3.040 41.22±0.001
120 45.65 ±4.830 42.05±3.435 44.43±2.370 46.98±0.135
180 54.87 ±5.018 50.36±4.020 50.81±0.919 55.22±0.269
240 64.53 ±4.876 58.18±5.540 58.59±3.969 61.14±0.272
300 70.21 ±5.925 63.97±4.176 63.85±2.718 68.99±0.268
360 77.28 ±5.527 70.83±4.491 67.98±2.466 73.97±0.538
420 84.30 ±1.644 79.44±2.225 72.84±2.676 78.30±0.806
480 88.61 ±0.739 87.56±0.674 85.81±0.580 81.61±0.411

Table 13: invitro drug release table of Microemulgel formulations (F6 – F9).

Figure 9: invitro drug release graph of Tizanidine Hcl microemulgel formulations (F1 – F9)

Kinetics of Drug Release

Drug release from all the batches of the microemulgel was evaluated for best fit model. Various kinetic models are zero order, first order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer Peppas are performed.

FORMULATION ZERO FIRST HIGUCHI KORSMEYER
ORDER ORDER
R2 R2 R2 R2 N
F1 0.976 0.984 0.922 0.964 0.795
F2 0.961 0.975 0.932 0.966 0.792
F3 0.93 0.988 0.919 0.953 0.801
F4 0.944 0.98 0.962 0.973 0.778
F5 0.937 0.989 0.972 0.983 0.757
F6 0.929 0.993 0.981 0.986 0.736
F7 0.939 0.993 0.977 0.982 0.739
F8 0.915 0.957 0.984 0.978 0.709
F9 0.899 0.987 0.985 0.972 0.71

Table 14: Release kinetics of tizanidine hydrochloride microemulgel.

Equation

Stability study

Stability study Optimized formulation was examined after 30 days for any changes in pH, rheological properties and drug release profiles. pH was found to be increased slightly. Viscosity was found to be increased at room temperature and then decreased at accelerated temperature. Drug release was found to be slightly decreased with temperature. Not much deviation was observed from optimized formulation F1, so it can be concluded that it showed acceptable stability on a given temperature and humidity. [Table 8]

Sl. No Formulation F1 Before  Stored at 400C ± 20C and 75%±5% RH
    storage      
      1st month 2nd month 3rd month
  Physical White and No change No change No change
1 Appearance smooth      
2 Consistency Viscous No change No change No change
3 Viscosity(cps) 7585 7564 7558 7572
4 pH 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.5
5 Spreadability
(gm.cm/sec)
14.7 14.8 14.7 15.1
6 Drug content (%) 94.27% 94.18% 94.09% 94.22%

Table 15: stability of optimized formulation F1.

Conclusion

Tizanidine hydrochloride was successfully formulated in the form of microemulgel by using microemulsion with carbopol 934 and Hpmc k 100 m as gelling agent. Microemulsions were prepared by varying Tween 80 and isopropyl alcohol concentration in five emulsions. And ME-5 was selected as optimized emulsion based on surface area distribution of globules (MA), and physical stability. ME-5 showed globule area of 198.8 nm. ME-5 showed good physical stability. Microemulgel was prepared by incorporation of ME-5 emulsion in formulation F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7 F8 and F9 respectively. The prepared microemulgel was pleasant in appearance and showed drug content ranged from 94.27 ± 1.838 to 75.21 ± 0.372%. pH of all the formulations was within a range of 5.5 to 6.5 which is in accordance with skin pH indicating compatibility with skin. The viscosity of all formulations ranged from 7585 to 9516 cps. All formulations showed pseudoplastic behavior. Spreadability values ranged from 13.2 to 14.7gm.cm/sec. All the formulations belong to fluid gel category. The percentage cumulative drug diffusion was found to be in the range of 8.50±0.540 to 97.36 ± 1.415 % after 8 hr. F1 formulation was selected as optimized formulation based on physical appearance, drug content, viscosity ,pH, spreadability.

References

international publisher, scitechnol, subscription journals, subscription, international, publisher, science

Track Your Manuscript

Awards Nomination