Journal of Otology & RhinologyISSN: 2324-8785

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
bahis siteleri bahis siteleri bahis siteleri casino siteleri

Research Article, J Otol Rhinol Vol: 5 Issue: 3

Outcome of Tracheostomy Closure in Oral Cancer Surgery Patients

Higashino M*, Kawata R, Omura S, Kikuoka Y, Suzuki N and Terada T
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
Corresponding author : Higashino M, MD
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
Tel: +81-72-683-1221
Fax: +81-72-684-6539
E-mail: oto061@osaka-med.ac.jp
Received: March 14, 2016 Accepted: April 22, 2016 Published: April 27, 2016
Citation: Higashino M, Kawata R, Omura S, Kikuoka Y, Suzuki N, et al. (2016) Outcome of Tracheostomy Closure in Oral Cancer Surgery Patients. J Otol Rhinol 5:3.. doi:10.4172/2324-8785.1000278

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the outcome of tracheal fistula in patients with oral cancer who underwent tracheostomy at the time of initial surgery.

Study Design: retrospective study

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the outcome of tracheal fistula in 57 patients with oral cancer who underwent tracheostomy. The patients were classified into three groups, which were patients in whom the tracheal fistula closed spontaneously (Group A), patients in whom closure of the tracheal fistula did not occur spontaneously and surgical closure was required (Group B), and patients in whom closure of the tracheostomy could not be achieved (Group C). The following factors were examined for associations with failure of spontaneous closure: patient demographics, primary tumor site, T classification, N classification, stage classification, presence or absence of neck dissection, presence or absence of reconstructive surgery, presence or absence of postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy, presence or absence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia, and duration of tracheal cannula placement.

Results: Among the 57 subjects, Group A were 27 (47.4%), Group B were 23 (40.4%), and Group C were 7 (12.3%). In Group B, surgical closure with a hinge flap was performed in all 23 patients. We found that neck dissection and postoperative (chemo) radiotherapy were both factors that had an independent influence on whether closure of the tracheostomy could be achieved.

Conclusion: Although early removal of the tracheal cannula is advantageous for improving the QOL of the patient, long-term cannulation does not interfere with spontaneous closure. Accordingly, it is necessary to carefully consider the timing of decannulation.

Keywords: Tracheostomy closure; Oral cancer; Larynx; Trachea

international publisher, scitechnol, subscription journals, subscription, international, publisher, science

Track Your Manuscript

Awards Nomination

Media Partners

Associations

open access