Journal of Womens Health, Issues and Care ISSN: 2325-9795

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Commentary, J Womens Health Issues Care Vol: 6 Issue: 4

Pregnancy and End-of-Life Care: An Example of the Medicolegal Junction Gone Wrong

Makaya BM*

University of Tennessee College of Medicine at Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA

*Corresponding Author : Brooklyne Marlowe Makaya, MD, JD
University of Tennessee College of Medicine at Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
Tel: 7064244392
E-mail:
[email protected]

Received: June 16, 2017 Accepted: July 14, 2017 Published: July 18, 2017

Citation: Makaya BM (2017) Pregnancy and End-of-Life Care: An Example of the Medicolegal Junction Gone Wrong. J Womens Health, Issues Care 6:4. doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000280

Abstract

Many state laws contain pregnancy exceptions to advanced directives. There is no uniform standard by which states decide when pregnancy should override a patient’s advanced directive. The issue of the pregnancy exception was brought to public attention in the Texas decision in Munoz vs. John Peter Smith Hospital. Munoz focused on the pregnancy exception with respect to a pregnant but brain dead woman. This article addresses Munoz, in part through use of a hypothetical situation, in order to raise the question of whether or not the pregnancy exception might better be addressed through uniform laws that are in line with current abortion law. This article also touches on the impact of the pregnancy exception on pregnant women who are not brain dead but who are incapacitated and the ethical implications of these laws on patients and medical personnel.

Keywords: Pregnancy; Brain dead; Anoxic brain injury

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page

Media Partners

Associations