Journal of Applied Bioinformatics & Computational Biology.ISSN: 2329-9533

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Appl Bioinforma Comput Biol Vol: 8 Issue: 1

Quantitative Models Identify Histone Signatures of Poised Genes Prior to Cellular Differentiation

Rui Tian*

School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

*Corresponding Author: Rui Tian
School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China
E-mail: [email protected].net

Received: March 12, 2019 Accepted: March 27, 2019 Published: April 03, 2019

Citation: Tian R (2019) Quantitative Models Identify Histone Signatures of Poised Genes Prior to Cellular Differentiation. J Appl Bioinforma Comput Biol 8:1. doi: 10.4172/2329-9533.1000164

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that histone marks are involved in pre-programming gene fates during cellular differentiation. Bivalent domains (marked by both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3) have been proposed to act in the histone prepatterning of poised genes; however, bivalent genes could also resolve into monovalent silenced states during differentiation. Thus, the histone signatures of poised genes need to be more precisely characterized.

Results: Using a support vector machine (SVM), we show that the collective histone modification data from human blood hematopoietic cells (HSCs) could predict poised genes with fairly high predictive accuracy within the model of directed erythrocyte differentiation from HSCs. Surprisingly, models with single histone marks (e.g., H3K4me3 or H2A.Z) could reach comparable predictive powers to the full model built with all of the nine histone marks. We also derived an H2A.Z and H3K9me3-based Naive Bayesian model for inferring poised genes, and the validity of this model was supported by data from several other pluripotent/multipotent cells (including mouse ES cells).

Conclusion: Our work represents a systematic quantitative study that verified that histone marks play a role in pre-programming the activation or repression of specific genes during cellular differentiation. Our results suggest that the relative quantities of H2A.Z modification and H3K9me3 modification are important in determining a corresponding gene’s fate during cellular differentiation.

Keywords: Histone modification; Cellular differentiation; Poising gene for expression; Support vector machine (SVM); Probabilistic model; Naive bayes; Prediction

Track Your Manuscript

Recommended Conferences

Share This Page