Journal of Athletic EnhancementISSN: 2324-9080

Reach Us +44 7482 874137
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Athl Enhancement Vol: 4 Issue: 1

Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance

Kyle A Burnett, Lee E Brown, Robert Kersey* and Kavin KW Tsang
California State University, Fullerton, 800 North State College Blvd, Fullerton, CA, USA
Corresponding author : Robert Kersey
Professor of Kinesiology, Director of Athletic Training Education Program, California State University, Fullerton, 800 North State College Blvd, Fullerton, CA, 92834-6870, USA
Tel: (657) 278-2676
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: December 21, 2014 Accepted: March 02, 2015 Published: March 07, 2015
Citation: Burnett KA, Brown LE, Kersey R, Tsang KKW (2015) Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance. J Athl Enhancement 4:1 doi:10.4172/2324-9080.1000187

Abstract

Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ankle taping and bracing on ankle plantar and dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and vertical jump performance. Twenty males with no history of current or recent lower extremity injury were recruited to participate. Subjects randomly performed under three conditions on three different days, (T) taping, (B) bracing, and (C) control. Ankle ROM was assessed at four time periods each day: pre-condition, post-condition, post-warm-up and post-jump. Following the condition application, subjects completed a dynamic warm-up and then performed three maximal vertical jumps on a force plate. Relative ground reaction force (relGRF) and relative impact force (relIF) were measured by the force plate, while vertical jump height (VJH) was estimated using the time-in-air equation. Ankle dorsi-plantar flexion ROM was measured using a standard goniometer and expressed in total degrees. The same certified athletic trainer performed all tape and brace applications, as well as all measurements. ANOVA for ROM revealed no differences at pre-condition, but control was significantly greater than T and B at all other time points. Vertical jump performance was not different between conditions. Although T and B ROM was acutely decreased and then increased over time, values were still less than C. Therefore, within the limits of this study, prophylactic taping and bracing may be used to provide ankle support without compromising vertical jump performance.

Keywords: Strength; Power; Range of motion; Forcet

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page