Journal of Athletic EnhancementISSN: 2324-9080

Reach Us +44 7482 874137
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Athl Enhanc Vol: 7 Issue: 3

Changes in Oxidative Stress Following Two Different Interval- Training Programs among Recreationally Active Males

Meckel Y1*, Eliakim A1,2, Sindiani M1 and Ben Zaken S1

1The Academic College at Wingate, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel

2Child Health and Sport Center, Pediatric Department, Meir Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

*Corresponding Author : Yoav Meckel, PhD
Life Science Department the Academic College at Wingate, Wingate Institute, Netanya 4290200, Israel
Tel: 972-9-8639361
Fax:
972-9-8650960
E-mail: [email protected]

Received: May 29, 2018 Accepted: July 19, 2018 Published: July 26, 2018

Citation: Meckel Y, Eliakim A, Sindiani M, Zaken SB (2018) Changes in Oxidative Stress Following Two Different Interval-Training Programs among Recreationally Active Males. J Athl Enhanc 7:3. doi: 10.4172/2324-9080.1000297

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of an increasing-distance interval-training program with a decreasing-distance interval-training program, matched for total distance and recovery times, on blood free radicals and total anti-oxidative capacity (TAC) at rest and following intense exercise. Forty physical education students were randomly assigned to either the increasing- or decreasing-distance interval-training group (ITG and DTG), and completed two similar relevant sets of tests before and after a six-week twicea- week training program. One training program consisted of increasing-distance interval training (100-200- 300-400-500 m) and the other decreasing-distance interval training (500-400-300-200-100 m). Following training, free radical resting levels were significantly higher in the ITG compared to the DTG (7.94 ± 4.76 vs. 3.84 ± 1.49 μmole, respectively, p<0.05). In addition, following training the free radical response to a maximal exercise test was significantly higher in the ITG compared to the DTG (11.14 ± 6.77 vs. 4.43 ± 1.97 μmole, respectively, p<0.05). No significant changes were found in TAC following the exercise test before and after the training program in either group. Sport scientists, coaches, and athletes should be aware that, in spite of identical total work, an interval-training program might induce different oxidative stress responses if the order of intervals is not identical.

Keywords: Sprint running; Training programs; Interval training; TAC

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page