Journal of Athletic EnhancementISSN: 2324-9080

Reach Us +18507546199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Athl Enhanc Vol: 6 Issue: 6

Dynamic Warm-up Duration Does Not Influence Vertical Jump Performance

Gavin Stuart1, Marino JS2, Hubbard-Turner T3 and Thomas AC3*

1Biodynamics Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

2Laboratory of Systems Physiology, Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

3Co-Director of Biodynamics Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

*Corresponding Author : Abbey Thomas, PhD, ATC
Assistant Professor, Co- Director of Biodynamics Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd. 231 Belk Gym Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
Tel: 704-687-8628
Fax:
704-687-0930
E-mail:
[email protected]

Received: August 31, 2017 Accepted: September 22, 2017 Published: September 27, 2017

Citation: Stuart G, Marino JS, Hubbard-Turner T, Thomas AC (2017) Dynamic Warm-up Duration Does Not Influence Vertical Jump Performance. J Athl Enhanc 6:6. doi: 10.4172/2324-9080.1000278

Abstract

Warm-up prepares the body for activity and minimizes injury risk while not hindering performance. However, the optimal parameters for a warm-up have yet to be defined. This study sought to determine how dynamic warm-up duration (5 vs. 10 minutes) influences vertical jump height and muscle strength. Twelve healthy adults (n=6 female, age: 21.5 ± 3.4 years; height:1.6 ± 0.1 m, mass: 58.2 ± 10.4 kg; n=6 male, age: 23.0 ± 0.9 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, mass: 91.0 ± 13.4 kg) completed 3 sessions: baseline and the dynamic warmups, each separated by 1 week. Warm-up order was randomized. Baseline and post-warm-up testing included vertical jump and quadriceps and hamstrings strength (normalized to body mass) assessment. The short warm-up consisted of dynamic stretches and a plyometric circuit performed for 5-minutes. The long warmup was identical to the short, except it was performed for 10-minutes. Heart rate and rating of perceived exertion were recorded before and after each warm-up. Repeated measures ANCOVAs with sex as a covariate determined differences in vertical jump and normalized muscle strength over time. Heart rate was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests examined changes in rating of perceived exertion over time. Males jumped higher than females (P<0.001); however, vertical jump height did not differ between protocols (P=0.082). Males had stronger quadriceps than females at baseline (P=0.017) but not following the short (P=0.091) or long (P=0.729) protocols. Quadriceps strength was greater at baseline (P<0.001) while hamstrings was lower (P=0.004). Heart rate (P<0.001) and rating of perceived exertion (P=0.002) were greater following both warm-ups compared to baseline. Warm-up did not improve vertical jump performance. Quadriceps strength did begin to decline; therefore, care should be taken when designing a dynamic warm-up in order not to impair subsequent activity performance.

Keywords: Strength; Jump height; Warm-up

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page