Journal of Hydrogeology & Hydrologic Engineering.ISSN: 2325-9647

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article,  J Hydrogeol Hydrol Eng Vol: 9 Issue: 3

Hydrologic Analysis using Civil Design versus HEC-HMS on Horsethief Creek Canyon Wash, California

Seema C Shah-Fairbank1* and Jacob J Castaneda2

1Department of Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, USA

2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

*Corresponding Author: Seema C Shah-Fairbank, Department of Civil Engineering
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, USA
Tel: +1-909-869-3954
E-mail: [email protected]

Received: June 12, 2020 Accepted: June 20, 2020 Published: June 29, 2020

Citation: Shah-Fairbank SC, Castaneda JJ (2020) Hydrologic Analysis using Civil Design versus HEC-HMS on Horsethief Creek Canyon Wash, California. J Hydrogeol Hydrol Eng 9:3. doi: 10.4172/2325-9647.1000198

Abstract

This project develops an effective process to compare hydrologic results from CivilD and HEC-HMS. CivilD is a hydrologic modeling software used in Southern California: specifically Riverside, Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, and San Bernardino counties. The software has a fee, but contains all of the necessary parameters to model a watershed with respect to the requirements in the jurisdictions with which it has received approval. HEC-HMS is a free hydrologic modeling software provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers, where the engineer needs to input all the necessary parameters. The results show that the percent difference between CivilD and HEC-HMS is 2.08% on average between varying storm return periods and durations. The greatest error occurs during the 25 year 24 hour storm due to, what is believed to be, variation in rounding of excess precipitation values between HECHMS preprocessing and the CivilD software. The study does not recommend the use of either software, it merely illustrates that they are both reliable tools for calculating flow rate. Based on our findings, we are able to verify the results of HEC-HMS with CivilD, and provide users with a clear understanding of the various inputs and outputs the programs require and generate, respectively. In addition, HEC-HMS allows a user to test various other hydrologic modeling methods, as the program provides a platform for more user autonomy. Thus, a user will gain value through exposure to insights this paper provides, which explain why a certain method is applicable for this project.

Keywords: Hydrology; Civil Design; HEC-HMS; Modeling; Watershed

Track Your Manuscript

Recommended Conferences

4th Annual Congress on Soil, Plant and Water Sciences

Barcelona, Spain

International Conference on Geology & Geochemistry

Dubai, UAE

Share This Page