Journal of Hydrogeology & Hydrologic EngineeringISSN: 2325-9647

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Editorial, J Hydrogeol Hydrol Eng Vol: 0 Issue: 0

The Perform Reach-Wide Optimization of The Floodway

Pettey Lucas

Contractor Engineer Research and Development Center, US Army Corps of Engineer, Vicksburg, MS 39180, United States

Corresponding author: Pettey Lucas, Contractor Engineer Research and Development Center, US Army Corps of Engineer, Vicksburg, MS 39180, United States, Tel: +123584898446; E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: 01 September, 2021; Accepted date: 16 September, 2021; Published date: 25 September, 2021

Keywords: Surface Water Hydrology Ground Water Quality & Analysis Erosion and Sedimentation Control Vadose Zone Hydrology

Introduction

Selvanathan and Diamond developed an ArcGIS tool that may run HEC-RAS, post-process the results, and visualize and swish the floodway from inside an ArcGIS setting. Their tool additionally permits the modeler to regulate encroachments visually within ArcGIS and contains a restricted optimization routine that tries to satisfy the surcharge demand. However, the main focus of their analysis was primarily on automation of repetitive HEC-RAS runs and postprocessing of its outputs. Franz and Melching introduced the complete Equations Utilities (FEQUTL) model that uses an repetitive trial and error procedure to see the left and right encroachment limits. Their model wasn't developed to perform reach-wide optimisation of the floodway, however it will offer the reader with a glimpse of the technique used for floodway determination. Majority of focus in floodway modeling revolves round the criteria and ways utilized in floodway modeling. Most discussions area unit primarily centered on modeling techniques, recommendations to modeling standards and procedures, and evaluating the utility and practicableness of applying one uniform normal for all floodways. Thomas and Golaszewski steered an improved repetitive procedure that involves a thought of non-steady section-averaged speed, variation of velocity-depth product, geography and geomorphic options, management of hydraulic structures, flow conveyance and results of hydraulic models. They additionally acknowledged that AN older practician is needed to delineate and assess floodways victimisation the improved repetitive procedure.

Lots of effort in optimisation of champaigns and floodways are devoted towards the system operations of flow management structures inside the floodway and floodplain management connected problems like flood risk assessment and value profit analysis of various floods and structures. Szemis et al. introduced AN optimisation framework for programing environmental flow management alternatives victimisation hymenopterans insect colony optimisation. Bogardi and Balogh developed a model that calculates the chance of dam failures and optimizes floodway operations. Luke et al. studied the impact on the floodway and dam damages within the new national capital floodway in Missouri of the detonation management throughout might of 2011 and ended that passive management would have greatly reduced the prices of repairing those hydraulic structures. Lund used applied math to develop AN approach that minimizes the expected flood damages and prices. Shafiei et al. examined completely different genetic algorithms (GA) for optimizing the dam encroachment style and ended that GAs area unit settle fordable tools for resolution the dam style issues whereas non-GA-based optimisation techniques might not be able to notice the world optimum of such issues as a result of the non-linear nature of the target perform surface. Mori and Parings developed a model for locating optimum Champaign development choices. Yazdi and Neyshabouri used the non-dominated sorting GA to seek out the optimum economist solutions of 2 objective functions minimizing flood mitigation prices and potential damages to the Champaign. Lu et al. planned AN inexact serial response designing approach for optimum management of floodplains. Porse used applied math to judge choices for urban Champaign development and assess potential flood damages. Woodward et al. developed a call web that generates effective mitigation measures and optimizes their performance employing a multi-objective optimisation algorithmic rule. Lopez-Llompart and Kondolf and Kondolf and Lopez-Llompart studied however floodway within the river had been laid low with land use conflicts and management. Czigáni et al. used the electro-acoustic transducer twenty one model for multi-purpose floodway segmentation and floodway delineation on the lower Hungarian Drava section. However, little has been done to provide AN optimized floodway boundary for the whole stream and an intensive literature review disclosed Froehlich’s and works.

Track Your Manuscript

Google scholar citation report
Citations : 185

Journal of Hydrogeology & Hydrologic Engineering received 185 citations as per google scholar report

Journal of Hydrogeology & Hydrologic Engineering peer review process verified at publons