Journal of Nanomaterials & Molecular NanotechnologyISSN: 2324-8777

Reach Us +44-7480-724769
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Nanomater Mol Nanotechnol S Vol: 0 Issue: 1

Elementary Polarizability of Sc/Fullerene/Graphene Aggregates and Di/Graphene–Cation Interactions

Francisco Torrens1* and Gloria Castellano2
1Institut Universitari de Ciència Molecular, Universitat de València, Edifici d’Instituts de Paterna, P. O. Box 22085, E-46071 València, Spain
2Facultad de Veterinaria y Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Guillem de Castro-94, E-46001 València, Spain
Corresponding author : Francisco Torrens
Institut Universitari de Ciència Molecular, Universitat de València, Edifici d’Instituts de Paterna, P. O. Box 22085, E-46071 València, Spain
Tel: +34 963 544 431; Fax: +34 963 543 274
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: June 16, 2013 Accepted: July 29, 2013 Published: August 09, 2013
Citation: Torrens F, Castellano G (2013) Elementary Polarizability of Sc/Fullerene/Graphene Aggregates and Di/Graphene–Cation Interactions. J Nanomater Mol Nanotechnol S1:001. doi:10.4172/2324-8777.S1-001

Abstract

Elementary Polarizability of Sc/Fullerene/Graphene Aggregates and Di/Graphene–Cation Interactions

Interacting induced-dipoles polarization in code POLAR allows molecular polarizability, which is tested with Scn/Cn [fullerene/ graphene (GR)]/Scn@Cm clusters. Polarizability sees clusters of unlike sizes, parting isomers. Bulk limit is estimated from Clausius– Mossotti relation. Clusters are more polarizable than the bulk. Theory yielded this for small Sin/Gen/GanAsm; however, experiment, reversely for larger Sin/GanAsm/GenTem. Smaller clusters need not act like middle: surface dangling bonds cause small-clusters polarizability that resembles metallic. Code AMYR models GR(2)– Mz+. A 24-atom plane models GR. Mz+ is placed on GR top (T)/ bridge (B)/hollow (H). GR–Mz+ stability decays: H>E>T. From H to T, stability drops 75%, 16%, 14%, 35%, 19% and 31% for Li+/Na+/ K+/M+ mean/Ca2+/average. In GR2–Mz+ from H to B to T, stability decays 4%/1%. Drops are smaller than GR–Mz+. Dispersion differs less than GR–Mz+. GR is more aware than GR2 to Mz+, M+/2+ swap and site.

Keywords:

Track Your Manuscript

Share This Page

Associations