Research Article, Geoinfor Geostat An Overview Vol: 5 Issue: 2
Dug-Well Biological Water Quality in Kumba-Cameroon: GIS Evaluation and Seasonal Variation of a Pollution Indicator
Akoachere Richard Ayuk* and Ngwese Yolande Mesode
Faculty of Science, Department of Geology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63. Buea, South West Region, Cameron
*Corresponding Author : Akoachere Richard Ayuk II
Faculty of Science, Department of Geology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63. Buea, South West Region – Cameroon
Tel: +2376 797 621 51
E-mail: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Received: December 12, 2017 Accepted: March 10, 2017 Published: March 15, 2017
Citation: Akoachere R.A. and Ngwese Y.M. (2017) Dug-Well Biological Water Quality in Kumba-Cameroon: GIS Evaluation and Seasonal Variation of a Pollution-Indicator. Geoinfor Geostat: An Overview 5:3.doi: 10.4172/2327-4581.1000160
Kumba (latitudes: 4°36?- 4°40?, longitudes: 9°23?- 9°29?), the economic capital of the Southwest Region - Cameroon, is located along the Cameroon Line at the northwestern edge of the Douala Basin. Dug well water is the major source of water in Kumba. Consumption of water contaminated by human and animal excreta is the greatest risk to public health from microbes that cause waterborne diseases and having the capacity to cause simultaneous infections on a large number of people. Safe drinking water is required for the development of any country. Field tests for physical parameters in ten dug wells was carried out for; total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, pH, depth to water levels measured and forty (ten per hydrogeological season) water samples collected. Coliform in forty well water samples was enumerated by presumptive laboratory tests to assess biological water quality. Seasonal field and laboratory test results were mounted on GIS platforms and the spatial variations determined. The ?Most Probable” Number of coliform per 100 ml in all the dug well water samples is far above the WHO standards for drinking water. 10-20% of the wells are suitable only for primary contact and 80-90% are grossly polluted by potentially harmful microorganisms with relatively greater pollution indicated in the wet seasons than the dry seasons. This is probably due to: a) The wet seasons: Shallow water levels, poor well construction, dumpsite leachates, septic tanks, animal feedlots, contaminated streamlets and surface run-off flow into wells. b) Dry seasons: Water stress and scarcity leading to increased frequency and number of users of non-dry dug wells? abstraction and increase of poor sanitary conditions (unclean abstraction utensils) in/ around wells.