Short Communication, J Pharm Sci Emerg Drugs Vol: 11 Issue: 3

In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches in DMPK: Tools for Predicting Drug Behavior

Vishwak Patil^*

¹Department of Pharmacology, Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Pune, India

*Corresponding Author: Vishwak Patil,
Department of Pharmacology, Rajgad Dnyanpeeth's College of Pharmacy, Pune, India
E-mail: patilvishwak@gmail.com

Received date: 22 May, 2023, Manuscript No. JPSED-23-106499;

Editor assigned date: 24 May, 2023, Pre QC. JPSED-23-106499 (PQ);

Reviewed date: 15 June, 2023, QC No. JPSED-23-106499;

Revised date: 22 June, 2023, Manuscript No. JPSED-23-106499 (R);

Published date: 29 June, 2023, DOI: 10.4172/2380-9477.1000142.

Citation: Patil V (2023) In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches in DMPK: Tools for Predicting Drug Behavior. J Pharm Sci Emerg Drugs 11:3.

Abstract

Keywords: Predicting Drug

Description

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) studies are essential in understanding the fate of drugs in the body, including their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. To predict drug behavior accurately, researchers utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. This study explores the tools and methodologies employed in DMPK research, focusing on the complementary roles of in vitro and in vivo studies in predicting drug behavior, optimizing drug development, and ensuring drug safety and efficacy [1].

In Vitro Approaches in DMPK

In vitro approaches involve conducting experiments outside of a living organism, typically using isolated cells, tissues, or enzymes. These methods provide valuable insights into drug behavior and interactions with cellular components. Some commonly used in vitro techniques in DMPK include:

Cell-based assays: Cultured cell lines or primary cells are used to study drug transport, metabolism, and interaction with specific cellular targets. These assays help assess drug permeability, efflux transporters, and cellular uptake mechanisms [2].

Microsomal and S9 fractions: These isolated subcellular fractions contain drug-metabolizing enzymes, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are the responsible for drug metabolism. In vitro incubations using microsomes or S9 fractions allow the measurement of drug metabolite formation rates and the identification of metabolites [3].

Hepatocytes: Primary hepatocytes, the main site of drug metabolism, are commonly used in DMPK research. Hepatocyte cultures can provide insights into drug metabolism, drug-drug interactions, and drug-induced toxicity [4].

Membrane transporter assays: These assays evaluate drug interactions with transporters involved in drug absorption and disposition. They help assess drug-drug interactions and predict the potential for transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions [5].

In vivo approaches in DMPK

In vivo studies involve experiments conducted in living organisms, such as animals or human subjects, to assess drug behavior in a complex physiological context. These studies provide a more comprehensive understanding of drug pharmacokinetics. Key in vivo approaches in DMPK include:

Pharmacokinetic studies: In vivo pharmacokinetic studies involve administering drugs to animals or human subjects and measuring drug concentrations in blood or other biological matrices over time. These studies provide insights into drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, helping to determine pharmacokinetic parameters such as clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life [6].

Drug-drug interaction studies: In vivo studies are essential for assessing potential drug-drug interactions, where the administration of multiple drugs can alter their pharmacokinetics. These studies help identify potential drug combinations that may result in altered efficacy or increased toxicity [7].

Metabolite profiling: In vivo studies allow the identification and characterization of drug metabolites formed during metabolism. Techniques such as Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LCMS) help in profiling drug metabolites and understanding their pharmacological properties [8].

Species comparison and scaling: In vivo studies in different species, including preclinical animal models, are important for understanding species-specific differences in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. This information aids in predicting human drug behavior and optimizing dosage regimens [9].

Combining in vitro and in vivo approaches

In vitro and in vivo approaches in DMPK are complementary and provide a comprehensive understanding of drug behavior. In vitro studies offer controlled experimental conditions, high throughput, and mechanistic insights into drug metabolism and transport. On the other hand, in vivo studies provide data on systemic drug behavior, interactions, and complex physiological factors. By integrating data from from both approaches, researchers can improve predictions of drug behavior, optimize drug development strategies, and assess safety and efficacy profiles [10].

Conclusion

In vitro and in vivo approaches are essential tools in DMPK research for predicting drug behavior. In vitro studies provide insights into drug metabolism, transport, and cellular interactions, while in vivo studies provide a holistic understanding of drug pharmacokinetics in living organisms. Combining data from both approaches enables researchers to optimize drug development, predict drug-drug interactions, and assess the safety and efficacy of drug candidates. Continued advancements in these tools and methodologies will enhance our ability to predict drug behavior accurately and improve the efficiency and success rate of drug development and therapeutic interventions.

References

1. Wan G, Du B, Pan S, Wu J (2020) Adaptive knowledge subgraph ensemble for robust and trustworthy knowledge graph completion. World Wide Web 23: 471-490.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]

2. Xu C, Nayyeri M, Vahdati S, Lehmann J (2021) Multiple run ensemble learning with low-dimensional knowledge graph embeddings. IEEE 1-8.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]

3. Tay Y, Luu AT, Hui SC (2017) Non-parametric estimation of multiple embeddings for link prediction on dynamic knowledge graphs. AAAI artificial intelligence 31: 1-7.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]

4. Choi SJ, Song HJ, Park SB (2020) An approach to knowledge base completion by a committee-based knowledge graph embedding. Appl Sci 10: 2651.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]

5. Greene RE (1970) Isometric embeddings of riemannian and pseudo-riemannian manifolds. Amer Math Soc 97: 1-63.

   [GoogleScholar]

6. Kelly AR, Hancock ER (2007) A riemannian approach to graph embedding. Pattern Recognit 40: 1042-1056.

   [Crossref] [GoogleScholar]

7. Nickel M, Kiela D (2017) Poincare embeddings for learning hierarchical representations. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30.

   [GoogleScholar]

8. Balazevic I, Allen C, Hospedales T (2019) Multi-relational poincare graph embeddings. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 32.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]

9. Mohamed SK, Novacek V, Vandenbussche PY, Munoz E (2019) Loss functions in knowledge graph embedding models. ESWC 2377: 1-10.

   [GoogleScholar]

10. Bach SH, Broecheler M, Huang B, Getoor L (2017) Hinge-loss markov random fields and probabilistic soft logic. J Mach Learn Res 18: 3846-3912.

    [GoogleScholar]